Updating the OMERACT filter: discrimination and feasibility

George Wells, Dorcas E Beaton, Peter Tugwell, Maarten Boers, John R Kirwan, Clifton O Bingham, Annelies Boonen, Peter Brooks, Philip G Conaghan, Maria-Antonietta D'Agostino, Maxime Dougados, Daniel E Furst, Laure Gossec, Francis Guillemin, Philip Helliwell, Sarah Hewlett, Tore K Kvien, Robert B Landewé, Lyn March, Philip J MeaseMikkel Østergaard, Lee Simon, Jasvinder A Singh, Vibeke Strand, Désirée M van der Heijde

20 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

The "Discrimination" part of the OMERACT Filter asks whether a measure discriminates between situations that are of interest. "Feasibility" in the OMERACT Filter encompasses the practical considerations of using an instrument, including its ease of use, time to complete, monetary costs, and interpretability of the question(s) included in the instrument. Both the Discrimination and Reliability parts of the filter have been helpful but were agreed on primarily by consensus of OMERACT participants rather than through explicit evidence-based guidelines. In Filter 2.0 we wanted to improve this definition and provide specific guidance and advice to participants.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Rheumatology
Vol/bind41
Udgave nummer5
Sider (fra-til)1005-10
Antal sider6
ISSN0315-162X
DOI
StatusUdgivet - maj 2014

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Updating the OMERACT filter: discrimination and feasibility'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater