Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Unravelling networks in local public health policymaking in three European countries - a systems analysis

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Development of measurable indicators to enhance public health evidence-informed policy-making

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Cross-sector cooperation in health-enhancing physical activity policymaking: more potential than achievements?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Exploring the use of research evidence in health-enhancing physical activity policies

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Poor social support and loneliness in chronic headache: Prevalence and effect modifiers

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. History of healthcare use and disease burden in older adults with different levels of alcohol use. A register-based cohort study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Physical activity, self-rated fitness and stress among 55,185 men and women in the Danish Capital Region Health survey 2017

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

Background: Facilitating and enhancing interaction between stakeholders involved in the policymaking process to stimulate collaboration and use of evidence, is important to foster the development of effective Health Enhancing Physical Activity (HEPA) policies. Performing an analysis of real-world policymaking processes will help reveal the complexity of a network of stakeholders. Therefore, the main objectives were to unravel the stakeholder network in the policy process by conducting three systems analyses, and to increase insight into the similarities and differences in the policy processes of these European country cases. Methods: A systems analysis of the local HEPA policymaking process was performed in three European countries involved in the 'REsearch into POlicy to enhance Physical Activity' (REPOPA) project, resulting in three schematic models showing the main stakeholders and their relationships. The models were used to compare the systems, focusing on implications with respect to collaboration and use of evidence in local HEPA policymaking. Policy documents and relevant webpages were examined and main stakeholders were interviewed. Results: The systems analysis in each country identified the main stakeholders involved and their position and relations in the policymaking process. The Netherlands and Denmark were the most similar and both differed most from Romania, especially at the level of accountability of the local public authorities for local HEPA policymaking. The categories of driving forces underlying the relations between stakeholders were formal relations, informal interaction and knowledge exchange. Conclusions: A systems analysis providing detailed descriptions of positions and relations in the stakeholder network in local level HEPA policymaking is rather unique in this area. The analyses are useful when a need arises for increased interaction, collaboration and use of knowledge between stakeholders in the local HEPA network, as they provide an overview of the stakeholders involved and their mutual relations. This information can be an important starting point to enhance the uptake of evidence and build more effective public health policies.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftHealth Research Policy and Systems
Vol/bind15
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)5
ISSN1478-4505
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 3 feb. 2017

ID: 51504163