Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Ultrasonography in trauma: a nation-wide cross-sectional investigation

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Lung ultrasound training: a systematic review of published literature in clinical lung ultrasound training

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  1. Trauma facilities in Denmark - a nationwide cross-sectional benchmark study of facilities and trauma care organisation

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Bronchoscopy as a supplement to computed tomography in patients with haemoptysis may be unnecessary

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Transfusion practice and complications after laparotomy - an observational analysis of a randomized clinical trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Traethedsbrud af collum femoris hos rask maratonløber

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. Relationship between nigrostriatal dopaminergic degeneration, urinary symptoms, and bladder control in Parkinson's disease

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • Jesper Weile
  • Klaus Nielsen
  • Stine C Primdahl
  • Christian A Frederiksen
  • Christian B. Laursen
  • Erik Sloth
  • Hans Kirkegaard
Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: The Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) protocol is considered beneficial in emergent evaluation of trauma patients with blunt or penetrating injury and has become integrated into the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) protocol. No guidelines exist as to the use of ultrasonography in trauma in Denmark. We aimed to determine the current use of ultrasonography for assessing trauma patients in Denmark.

METHODS: We conducted a nation-wide cross-sectional investigation of ultrasonography usage in trauma care. The first phase consisted of an Internet-based investigation of existing guidelines, and the second phase was a series of structured interviews of orthopedic surgeons, anesthesiologists, and radiologists on call in all hospitals receiving traumatized patients in Denmark.

RESULTS: Guidelines were obtained from all 22 hospitals receiving traumatized patients in Denmark. Twenty-one (95.5%) of the guidelines included and recommended FAST as part of trauma assessment. The recommended person to perform the examination was the radiologist in n = 11 (50.0%), the surgeon in n = 6 (27.3%), the anesthesiologist in n = 1 (4.5%), and unspecified in n = 3 (13.6%) facilities. FAST indications varied between circulatory instability n = 8 (36.4%), team leader's discretion n = 6 (27.3%), abdominal trauma n = 3 (13.6%), and not specified n = 6 (27.3%). Telephone interviews revealed that exams were always n = 8 (36.4%) or often n = 4 (18.2%) registered in the patients' charts. The remaining n = 10 (45.5%) facilities either never registered n = 2 (9.1%), it was not possible to register n = 1 (4.5%), or unknown by the trauma leaders n = 7 (31.8%). Images were often stored in n = 1 (4.5%), never stored in n = 10 (45.5%), not possible to store in n = 2 (9.1%), and unknown in n = 9 (40.9%) facilities.

CONCLUSION: Ultrasonography was used in a non-uniform fashion by multiple specialties in Danish trauma facilities. Very few images from FAST examinations were stored and documentation was scanty. National guidelines on application and documentation of ultrasonography in trauma are called for.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftCritical Ultrasound Journal
Vol/bind9
Udgave nummer16
ISSN2036-3176
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 1 jun. 2017

ID: 50633888