Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Two-year results of the randomized clinical trial DILALA comparing laparoscopic lavage with resection as treatment for perforated diverticulitis

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Associations between blood cultures after surgery for colorectal cancer and long-term oncological outcomes

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Closure of the fascial defect during laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Functional outcomes from a randomized trial of early closure of temporary ileostomy after rectal excision for cancer

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Prospective observational cohort study on grading the severity of postoperative complications in global surgery research

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Closure of the fascial defect during laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Incidence of Inguinal Hernia after Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Kønsmodificerende kirurgi i Danmark

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Outcome Measures in Gender-Confirming Chest Surgery: A Systematic Scoping Review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis was treated with resection and colostomy (Hartmann's procedure), with inherent complications and risk of a permanent stoma. The DILALA (DIverticulitis - LAparoscopic LAvage versus resection (Hartmann's procedure) for acute diverticulitis with peritonitis) and other randomized trials found laparoscopic lavage to be a feasible and safe alternative. The medium-term follow-up results of DILALA are reported here.

METHODS: Patients were randomized during surgery after being diagnosed with Hinchey grade III perforated diverticulitis at diagnostic laparoscopy. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with one or more secondary operations from 0 to 24 months after the index procedure in the laparoscopic lavage versus Hartmann's procedure groups. The trial was registered as ISRCTN82208287.

RESULTS: Forty-three patients were randomized to laparoscopic lavage and 40 to Hartmann's procedure. Patients in the lavage group had a 45 per cent reduced risk of undergoing one or more operations within 24 months (relative risk 0·55, 95 per cent c.i. 0·36 to 0·84; P = 0·012) and had fewer operations (ratio 0·51, 95 per cent c.i. 0·31 to 0·87; P = 0·024) compared with those in the Hartmann's group. No difference was found in mean number of readmissions (1·37 versus 1·50; P = 0·221) or mortality between patients randomized to laparoscopic lavage or Hartmann's procedure. Three patients in the lavage group and nine in the Hartmann's group had a colostomy at 24 months.

CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic lavage is a better option for perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis than open resection and colostomy.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftThe British journal of surgery
Vol/bind105
Udgave nummer9
Sider (fra-til)1128-1134
Antal sider6
ISSN0007-1323
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 16 apr. 2018

ID: 53715402