Trial sequential analyses of meta-analyses of complications in laparoscopic vs. small-incision cholecystectomy: more randomized patients are needed

Frederik Keus, Jørn Wetterslev, Christian Gluud, Hein G Gooszen, Cornelis JHM van Laarhoven

19 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

Conclusions based on meta-analyses of randomized trials carry a status of "truth." Methodological components may identify trials with systematic errors ("bias"). Trial sequential analysis (TSA) evaluates random errors in meta-analysis. We analyzed meta-analyses on laparoscopic vs. small-incision cholecystectomy regarding different outcome measures for the occurrence of type I errors.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Vol/bind63
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)246-56
Antal sider11
ISSN0895-4356
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 1 mar. 2010

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Trial sequential analyses of meta-analyses of complications in laparoscopic vs. small-incision cholecystectomy: more randomized patients are needed'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater