TY - JOUR
T1 - Treatment modifiers of interpersonal functioning in psychotherapy for people with borderline personality disorder
T2 - Systematic review with meta-analyses of individual participant data
AU - Pereira Ribeiro, Johanne
AU - Stoffers-Winterling, Jutta
AU - Jørgensen, Mie Sedoc
AU - Juul, Sophie
AU - Matbouriahi, Minoo
AU - Fisher, David
AU - van Ballegooijen, Wouter
AU - Kongerslev, Mickey
AU - Simonsen, Erik
AU - Karyotaki, Eirini
AU - Cuijpers, Pim
AU - Bateman, Anthony
AU - Klein, Jan Philipp
AU - Amianto, Federico
AU - Fonagy, Peter
AU - Dixon-Gordon, Katherine
AU - Chapman, Alexander L
AU - Thomaes, Kathleen
AU - Jacob, Gitta A
AU - Kramer, Ueli
AU - Philips, Björn
AU - Franck, Johan
AU - Priebe, Stefan
AU - Zanarini, Mary C
AU - Black, Donald W
AU - McMain, Shelley
AU - Dekker, Jack
AU - Storebø, Ole Jakob
N1 - Copyright © 2026 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2026/3
Y1 - 2026/3
N2 - BACKGROUND: Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is often accompanied by interpersonal dysfunction. Psychotherapy can improve interpersonal functioning, but individual characteristics may moderate outcomes. This systematic review used individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) to examine such moderators.METHOD: A literature search up to 26 November 2025 across 10 databases (including PubMed, Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL) identified randomised clinical trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of psychotherapy on interpersonal functioning in individuals with BPD compared to treatment as usual (TAU) or clinical management control interventions (CM). Authors of included trials were contacted to retrieve IPD. IPD-MAs employed a one-stage random-effects approach to estimate treatment effects on interpersonal functioning and potential moderators in bivariate linear mixed-effects models. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021210688).RESULTS: Out of 23,735 identified records, 32 RCTs (2762 participants) met inclusion criteria. Individual participant data (IPD) were available for 17 trials (1431 participants). All trials were rated as having either high risk of bias or some concerns. Missing data were common, with 321 out of 1431 participants (23%) lost to follow-up. Meta-analyses of both aggregate data and IPD yielded comparable effect estimates, though statistical significance differed (IPD-MA: β = -0.21, CI: -0.45 to -0.02, SE = 0.12, p = 0.0778; 17 trials, 1071 participants). In unadjusted analyses, the presence of co-occurring anxiety disorder(s) (β = -0.40, 95% CI: -0.73 to -0.08) and a higher number of co-occurring disorders (β = -0.08, 95% CI: -0.15 to -0.01) were associated with larger treatment effects (not significant after alpha correction).CONCLUSION: Psychotherapy appears to be effective for individuals with BPD. Although moderator effects did not remain statistically significant after alpha correction, unadjusted analyses suggested larger treatment effects in individuals with co-occurring anxiety and greater clinical complexity. Importantly, these findings indicate that such comorbidities may not be a contraindication for psychotherapy for BPD.
AB - BACKGROUND: Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is often accompanied by interpersonal dysfunction. Psychotherapy can improve interpersonal functioning, but individual characteristics may moderate outcomes. This systematic review used individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) to examine such moderators.METHOD: A literature search up to 26 November 2025 across 10 databases (including PubMed, Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL) identified randomised clinical trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of psychotherapy on interpersonal functioning in individuals with BPD compared to treatment as usual (TAU) or clinical management control interventions (CM). Authors of included trials were contacted to retrieve IPD. IPD-MAs employed a one-stage random-effects approach to estimate treatment effects on interpersonal functioning and potential moderators in bivariate linear mixed-effects models. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021210688).RESULTS: Out of 23,735 identified records, 32 RCTs (2762 participants) met inclusion criteria. Individual participant data (IPD) were available for 17 trials (1431 participants). All trials were rated as having either high risk of bias or some concerns. Missing data were common, with 321 out of 1431 participants (23%) lost to follow-up. Meta-analyses of both aggregate data and IPD yielded comparable effect estimates, though statistical significance differed (IPD-MA: β = -0.21, CI: -0.45 to -0.02, SE = 0.12, p = 0.0778; 17 trials, 1071 participants). In unadjusted analyses, the presence of co-occurring anxiety disorder(s) (β = -0.40, 95% CI: -0.73 to -0.08) and a higher number of co-occurring disorders (β = -0.08, 95% CI: -0.15 to -0.01) were associated with larger treatment effects (not significant after alpha correction).CONCLUSION: Psychotherapy appears to be effective for individuals with BPD. Although moderator effects did not remain statistically significant after alpha correction, unadjusted analyses suggested larger treatment effects in individuals with co-occurring anxiety and greater clinical complexity. Importantly, these findings indicate that such comorbidities may not be a contraindication for psychotherapy for BPD.
KW - Borderline personality disorder
KW - Co-occurring disorder
KW - Individual participant data
KW - Meta-analysis
KW - Moderator
KW - Psychotherapy
KW - Systematic review
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105029378570
U2 - 10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102707
DO - 10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102707
M3 - Review
C2 - 41655316
SN - 0272-7358
VL - 124
SP - 102707
JO - Clinical Psychology Review
JF - Clinical Psychology Review
M1 - 102707
ER -