TY - JOUR
T1 - Treatment Intensification With Either Fludarabine, AraC, G-CSF and Idarubicin, or Cladribine Plus Daunorubicin and AraC on the Basis of Residual Disease Status in Older Patients With AML
T2 - Results From the NCRI AML18 Trial
AU - Russell, Nigel H
AU - Thomas, Abin
AU - Hills, Robert K
AU - Thomas, Ian
AU - Gilkes, Amanda
AU - Almuina, Nuria Marquez
AU - Burns, Sarah
AU - Marsh, Lucy
AU - Vyas, Paresh
AU - Metzner, Marlen
AU - McCarthy, Nicholas
AU - Andrew, Georgia
AU - Byrne, Jennifer
AU - Sellar, Rob S
AU - Kelly, Richard
AU - Cahalin, Paul
AU - Overgaard, Ulrik Malthe
AU - Mehta, Priyanka
AU - Dennis, Mike
AU - Knapper, Steven
AU - Freeman, Sylvie D
PY - 2025/2/20
Y1 - 2025/2/20
N2 - PURPOSE: To evaluate the survival benefit of chemotherapy intensification in older patients with AML who have not achieved a measurable residual disease (MRD)-negative remission.METHODS: Five hundred twenty-three patients with AML (median age, 67 years; range, 51-79) without a flow cytometric MRD-negative remission response after a first course of daunorubicin and AraC (DA; including 165 not in remission) were randomly assigned between up to two further courses of DA or intensified chemotherapy-either fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and idarubicin (FLAG-Ida) or DA with cladribine (DAC).RESULTS: Overall survival (OS) was not improved in the intensification arms (DAC v DA: hazard ratio [HR], 0.74 [95% CI, 0.55 to 1.01]; P = .054; FLAG-Ida v DA: HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.66 to 1.12]; P = .270); OS at 3 years was 34%, 46%, and 42% for DA, DAC, and FLAG-Ida, respectively. Early deaths and other adverse events were more frequent with FLAG-Ida (9% day 60 deaths v 4% after DA or DAC; P = .032). Of patients entering random assignment, 131 had MRD unknown status. In this subgroup of patients lacking evidence of residual leukemia by flow cytometry, there was no detectable survival advantage from intensification. A planned sensitivity analysis excluding these patients demonstrated a survival benefit for both DAC (HR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.46 to 0.93]; P = .018) and FLAG-Ida (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.53 to 0.98]; P = .035); OS at 3 years was 30%, 46%, and 46% for DA, DAC, and FLAG-Ida, respectively. There was a concordant reduction in relapse (DAC v DA: HR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.98]; P = .039; FLAG-Ida v DA: HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.49 to 0.99]; P = .042). DAC benefit was maintained when survival was censored for transplant (P = .042).CONCLUSION: In this study of older patients with AML considered fit and with evidence of residual disease after first induction, chemotherapy intensification improved survival. DAC intensification was better tolerated than FLAG-Ida.
AB - PURPOSE: To evaluate the survival benefit of chemotherapy intensification in older patients with AML who have not achieved a measurable residual disease (MRD)-negative remission.METHODS: Five hundred twenty-three patients with AML (median age, 67 years; range, 51-79) without a flow cytometric MRD-negative remission response after a first course of daunorubicin and AraC (DA; including 165 not in remission) were randomly assigned between up to two further courses of DA or intensified chemotherapy-either fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and idarubicin (FLAG-Ida) or DA with cladribine (DAC).RESULTS: Overall survival (OS) was not improved in the intensification arms (DAC v DA: hazard ratio [HR], 0.74 [95% CI, 0.55 to 1.01]; P = .054; FLAG-Ida v DA: HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.66 to 1.12]; P = .270); OS at 3 years was 34%, 46%, and 42% for DA, DAC, and FLAG-Ida, respectively. Early deaths and other adverse events were more frequent with FLAG-Ida (9% day 60 deaths v 4% after DA or DAC; P = .032). Of patients entering random assignment, 131 had MRD unknown status. In this subgroup of patients lacking evidence of residual leukemia by flow cytometry, there was no detectable survival advantage from intensification. A planned sensitivity analysis excluding these patients demonstrated a survival benefit for both DAC (HR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.46 to 0.93]; P = .018) and FLAG-Ida (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.53 to 0.98]; P = .035); OS at 3 years was 30%, 46%, and 46% for DA, DAC, and FLAG-Ida, respectively. There was a concordant reduction in relapse (DAC v DA: HR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.98]; P = .039; FLAG-Ida v DA: HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.49 to 0.99]; P = .042). DAC benefit was maintained when survival was censored for transplant (P = .042).CONCLUSION: In this study of older patients with AML considered fit and with evidence of residual disease after first induction, chemotherapy intensification improved survival. DAC intensification was better tolerated than FLAG-Ida.
KW - Aged
KW - Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
KW - Cladribine/administration & dosage
KW - Cytarabine/administration & dosage
KW - Daunorubicin/administration & dosage
KW - Female
KW - Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/administration & dosage
KW - Humans
KW - Idarubicin/administration & dosage
KW - Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Neoplasm, Residual
KW - Vidarabine/analogs & derivatives
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85210759477&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.24.00259
DO - 10.1200/JCO.24.00259
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 39556780
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 43
SP - 694
EP - 704
JO - Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
IS - 6
ER -