TY - JOUR
T1 - Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With and Without Resheathing and Repositioning
T2 - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
AU - Moroni, Francesco
AU - Azzalini, Lorenzo
AU - Sondergaard, Lars
AU - Attizzani, Guilherme F
AU - García, Santiago
AU - Jneid, Hani
AU - Mamas, Mamas A
AU - Bagur, Rodrigo
PY - 2022/6/21
Y1 - 2022/6/21
N2 - Background There is a concern that resheathing/repositioning of transcatheter heart valves during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) may lead to an increased risk of periprocedural complications. We aimed to evaluate the short- and long-term impact on clinical outcomes of resheathing for repositioning of transcatheter heart valves during TAVI procedures. Methods and Results We conducted a systematic search of Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases to identify studies comparing outcomes between patients requiring resheathing/repositioning during TAVI and those who did not. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to estimate the association of resheathing compared with no resheathing with clinical outcomes after TAVI. Seven studies including 4501 participants (pooled mean age, 80.9±7.4 years; 54% women; and 1374 [30.5%] patients requiring resheathing/repositioning) were included in this study. No significant differences between the 2 groups were identified with regards to safety: 30-day mortality (n=3125; odds ratio [OR], 0.74 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41-1.33];
I
2=0%), stroke (n=4121; OR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.74-1.62];
I
2=0%), coronary obstruction (n=3000; OR, 2.35 [95% CI, 0.17-33.47];
I
2=75%), major vascular complications (n=3125; OR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.66-1.33];
I
2=0%), major bleeding (n=3125; OR, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.94-2.01];
I
2=39%), acute kidney injury (n=3495; OR, 1.30 [95% CI, 0.64-2.62];
I
2=44%), and efficacy outcomes: device success (n=1196; OR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.51-1.14];
I
2=0%), need for a second valve (n=3170; OR, 2.86 [95% CI, 0.96-8.48];
I
2=62%), significant (moderate or higher) paravalvular leak (n=1151; OR, 1.53 [95% CI, 0.83-2.80];
I
2=0%), and permanent pacemaker implantation (n=1908; OR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.68-1.57];
I
2=58%). One-year mortality was similar between groups (n=1972; OR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.68-1.47];
I
2=0%). Conclusions Resheathing of transcatheter heart valves during TAVI is associated with similar periprocedural risk compared with no resheathing in several patient-important outcomes. These data support the safety of current self-expanding transcatheter heart valves with resheathing features. Registration URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; Unique identifier: CRD42021273715.
AB - Background There is a concern that resheathing/repositioning of transcatheter heart valves during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) may lead to an increased risk of periprocedural complications. We aimed to evaluate the short- and long-term impact on clinical outcomes of resheathing for repositioning of transcatheter heart valves during TAVI procedures. Methods and Results We conducted a systematic search of Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases to identify studies comparing outcomes between patients requiring resheathing/repositioning during TAVI and those who did not. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to estimate the association of resheathing compared with no resheathing with clinical outcomes after TAVI. Seven studies including 4501 participants (pooled mean age, 80.9±7.4 years; 54% women; and 1374 [30.5%] patients requiring resheathing/repositioning) were included in this study. No significant differences between the 2 groups were identified with regards to safety: 30-day mortality (n=3125; odds ratio [OR], 0.74 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41-1.33];
I
2=0%), stroke (n=4121; OR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.74-1.62];
I
2=0%), coronary obstruction (n=3000; OR, 2.35 [95% CI, 0.17-33.47];
I
2=75%), major vascular complications (n=3125; OR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.66-1.33];
I
2=0%), major bleeding (n=3125; OR, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.94-2.01];
I
2=39%), acute kidney injury (n=3495; OR, 1.30 [95% CI, 0.64-2.62];
I
2=44%), and efficacy outcomes: device success (n=1196; OR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.51-1.14];
I
2=0%), need for a second valve (n=3170; OR, 2.86 [95% CI, 0.96-8.48];
I
2=62%), significant (moderate or higher) paravalvular leak (n=1151; OR, 1.53 [95% CI, 0.83-2.80];
I
2=0%), and permanent pacemaker implantation (n=1908; OR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.68-1.57];
I
2=58%). One-year mortality was similar between groups (n=1972; OR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.68-1.47];
I
2=0%). Conclusions Resheathing of transcatheter heart valves during TAVI is associated with similar periprocedural risk compared with no resheathing in several patient-important outcomes. These data support the safety of current self-expanding transcatheter heart valves with resheathing features. Registration URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; Unique identifier: CRD42021273715.
KW - Aged
KW - Aged, 80 and over
KW - Aortic Valve/surgery
KW - Aortic Valve Stenosis
KW - Female
KW - Heart Valve Prosthesis
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Postoperative Complications/epidemiology
KW - Risk Factors
KW - Stroke/epidemiology
KW - Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/methods
KW - Treatment Outcome
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132249649&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1161/JAHA.121.024707
DO - 10.1161/JAHA.121.024707
M3 - Review
C2 - 35699176
SN - 2047-9980
VL - 11
JO - Journal of the American Heart Association
JF - Journal of the American Heart Association
IS - 12
M1 - e024707
ER -