TY - JOUR
T1 - Training Thoracic Ultrasound Skills
T2 - A Randomized Controlled Trial of Simulation-Based Training versus Training on Healthy Volunteers
AU - Pietersen, Pia Iben
AU - Jørgensen, Rasmus
AU - Graumann, Ole
AU - Konge, Lars
AU - Skaarup, Søren Helbo
AU - Lawaetz Schultz, Hans Henrik
AU - Laursen, Christian B
N1 - © 2021 S. Karger AG, Basel.
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - INTRODUCTION: As ultrasound becomes more accessible, the use of point-of-care ultrasound examinations performed by clinicians has increased. Sufficient theoretical and practical skills are prerequisites to integrate thoracic ultrasound into a clinical setting and to use it as supplement in the clinical decision-making. Recommendations on how to educate and train clinicians for these ultrasound examinations are debated, and simulation-based training may improve clinical performance.OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to explore the effect of simulation-based training in thoracic ultrasound compared to training on healthy volunteers.METHOD: A total of 66 physicians with no previous experience in thoracic ultrasound completed a training program and assessment of competences from November 2018 to May 2019. After a theoretical session in ultrasound physics, sonoanatomy, and thoracic ultrasound, the physicians were randomized into one of three groups for practical training: (1) simulation-based training, (2) training on a healthy volunteer, or (3) no training (control group). Primary outcome was difference in the clinical performance score after the training period.RESULTS: Using a multiple comparison, ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for multiplicity, there was no statistical significant difference between the two trained groups' performance score: 45.1 points versus 41.9 points (minimum 17 points, maximum 68 points; p = 0.38). The simulation-based training group scored significantly higher than the control group without hands-on training, 36.7 points (p = 0.009).CONCLUSIONS: The use of simulation-based training in thoracic ultrasound does not improve the clinical performance score compared to conventional training on healthy volunteers. As focused, thoracic ultrasound is a relatively uncomplicated practical procedure when taught; focus should mainly be on the theoretical part and the supervised clinical training in a curriculum. However, simulation can be used instead or as an add-on to training on simulated patients.
AB - INTRODUCTION: As ultrasound becomes more accessible, the use of point-of-care ultrasound examinations performed by clinicians has increased. Sufficient theoretical and practical skills are prerequisites to integrate thoracic ultrasound into a clinical setting and to use it as supplement in the clinical decision-making. Recommendations on how to educate and train clinicians for these ultrasound examinations are debated, and simulation-based training may improve clinical performance.OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to explore the effect of simulation-based training in thoracic ultrasound compared to training on healthy volunteers.METHOD: A total of 66 physicians with no previous experience in thoracic ultrasound completed a training program and assessment of competences from November 2018 to May 2019. After a theoretical session in ultrasound physics, sonoanatomy, and thoracic ultrasound, the physicians were randomized into one of three groups for practical training: (1) simulation-based training, (2) training on a healthy volunteer, or (3) no training (control group). Primary outcome was difference in the clinical performance score after the training period.RESULTS: Using a multiple comparison, ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for multiplicity, there was no statistical significant difference between the two trained groups' performance score: 45.1 points versus 41.9 points (minimum 17 points, maximum 68 points; p = 0.38). The simulation-based training group scored significantly higher than the control group without hands-on training, 36.7 points (p = 0.009).CONCLUSIONS: The use of simulation-based training in thoracic ultrasound does not improve the clinical performance score compared to conventional training on healthy volunteers. As focused, thoracic ultrasound is a relatively uncomplicated practical procedure when taught; focus should mainly be on the theoretical part and the supervised clinical training in a curriculum. However, simulation can be used instead or as an add-on to training on simulated patients.
KW - Chest ultrasound
KW - Education
KW - Simulation
KW - Training
KW - Ultrasound
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100031346&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1159/000509298
DO - 10.1159/000509298
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 33454705
SN - 0025-7931
VL - 100
SP - 34
EP - 43
JO - Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases
JF - Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases
IS - 1
ER -