Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Training and Assessment of Hysteroscopic Skills: A Systematic Review

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Direct Observation vs. Video-Based Assessment in Flexible Cystoscopy

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Nonspecialist Raters Can Provide Reliable Assessments of Procedural Skills

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Evaluation of Procedural Simulation as a Training and Assessment Tool in General Surgery-Simulating a Laparoscopic Appendectomy

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Noticeable Variations in the Educational Exposure During Residency in Danish Orthopedic Departments

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. Ensuring Competency of Novice Laparoscopic Surgeons-Exploring Standard Setting Methods and their Consequences

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Maintaining Competence in Airway Management

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Using computerized assessment in simulated colonoscopy: a validation study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Ensuring Competency in Open Aortic Aneurysm Repair - Development and Validation of a New Assessment Tool

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. The Positivism Paradigm of Research

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review was to identify studies on hysteroscopic training and assessment.

DESIGN: PubMed, Excerpta Medica, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched in January 2015. Manual screening of references and citation tracking were also performed. Studies on hysteroscopic educational interventions were selected without restrictions on study design, populations, language, or publication year. A qualitative data synthesis including the setting, study participants, training model, training characteristics, hysteroscopic skills, assessment parameters, and study outcomes was performed by 2 authors working independently. Effect sizes were calculated when possible. Overall, 2 raters independently evaluated sources of validity evidence supporting the outcomes of the hysteroscopy assessment tools.

RESULTS: A total of 25 studies on hysteroscopy training were identified, of which 23 were performed in simulated settings. Overall, 10 studies used virtual-reality simulators and reported effect sizes for technical skills ranging from 0.31 to 2.65; 12 used inanimate models and reported effect sizes for technical skills ranging from 0.35 to 3.19. One study involved live animal models; 2 studies were performed in clinical settings. The validity evidence supporting the assessment tools used was low. Consensus between the 2 raters on the reported validity evidence was high (94%).

CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review demonstrated large variations in the effect of different tools for hysteroscopy training. The validity evidence supporting the assessment of hysteroscopic skills was limited.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Surgical Education
Vol/bind73
Udgave nummer5
Sider (fra-til)906-18
Antal sider13
ISSN1931-7204
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 23 maj 2016

ID: 49203504