Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Training and assessment of competence in resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) - a systematic review

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewpeer review

  1. Dual-energy CT

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewpeer review

  2. Evaluation of competence in ultrasound-guided procedures-a generic assessment tool developed through the Delphi method

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Training and education of healthcare workers during viral epidemics: a systematic review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Reliable test of clinicians' mastery in skin cancer diagnostics

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. Training non-intensivist doctors to work with COVID-19 patients in intensive care units

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a potentially life-saving but high-risk emergency procedure in patients with haemorrhagic shock. Lack of physicians with competence in the procedure is a barrier to implementation of REBOA. It is currently unclear how training and assessment of competence should be done.

OBJECTIVES: To report and evaluate research in training and assessment of competence in REBOA and femoral arterial access with the aim to investigate the effect of simulation-based training in the procedure and to provide suggestions for the future design of training programs and assessment tools.

METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies on training or assessment of competence in REBOA and femoral arterial access. Bias assessment was done using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument. Evidence level was assessed using GRADE.

RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included, six of them published as abstracts. Full-text studies included 189 trainees ranging in experience level from military medics to surgical specialists. Outcome measures were heterogenous; the most used were rater checklists, knowledge testing, and procedure time. All studies confirmed an effect of training of REBOA on procedural competence in a simulation setting but had a high degree of bias. No study developed or used an assessment tool supported by validity evidence and no study investigated mid and long-term outcomes.

CONCLUSION: Simulation-based training of REBOA improves skills, however, the evidence level is very low and data cannot answer important questions on effect size, skill transfer and retention, and optimal course design. To advance research and training programmes, an assessment tool supported by validity evidence with broad applicability is needed.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftInjury
Vol/bind51
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)147-156
Antal sider10
ISSN0020-1383
DOI
StatusUdgivet - feb. 2020

Bibliografisk note

Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

ID: 58584391