Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Time from submission to publication varied widely for biomedical journals: a systematic review

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  1. Mesenteric Lymphadenitis and Terminal Ileitis is Associated With Yersinia Infection: A Meta-analysis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Most Cochrane reviews have not been updated formore than 5 years

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLetterForskningpeer review

  3. Surgeon Volume and Risk of Reoperation after Laparoscopic Primary Ventral Hernia Repair: A Nationwide Register-Based Study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Younger age at onset of colorectal cancer is associated with increased patient's delay

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. Surgical techniques for repair of abdominal rectus diastasis: a scoping review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

OBJECTIVE: Fast dissemination of research is important for improving treatments and thus benefitting patients, caregivers, and researchers. However, getting scientific papers published may take a long time. The editorial handling time can be delayed by several processes both before and after acceptance of the paper. The aim of this study was to systematically review the editorial handling time of biomedical peer-reviewed literature (i.e. time from submission to publication).

METHODS: The protocol for this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020196238). PubMed and EMBASE were searched systematically on 29 May 2020. We included publications on the timespan between submission and publication for accepted articles published in biomedical journals.

RESULTS: Of the 4197 unique studies identified in the search, 69 were included in the systematic review. The mean timespan from submission to publication varied from 91 to 639 days, while the median timespan varied from 70 to 558 days. Submission to acceptance and acceptance to publication timespans showed similar disparity with means ranging from 50 to 276 and 11 to 362 days, respectively. Data were too statistically heterogeneous to perform meta-analyses.

CONCLUSION: Editorial handling times of journals varied widely from a few months to almost two years, which delays the availability of new evidence. The editorial handling time did not differ between submission-to-acceptance-time and acceptance-to-publication-time. Examining differences in editorial processes between journals with long and short editorial handling times may help uncover, which processes are frequent causes of delay and thereby where to improve.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftCurrent Medical Research and Opinion
Vol/bind37
Udgave nummer6
Sider (fra-til)985-993
Antal sider9
ISSN0300-7995
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 3 jun. 2021

ID: 67642657