Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Three-dimensional laparoscopy vs 2-dimensional laparoscopy with high-definition technology for abdominal surgery: a systematic review

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  1. The use of component separation during abdominal wall reconstruction in contaminated fields: A case-control analysis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Risk of adhesive bowel obstruction after abdominal surgery. A national cohort study of 665,423 Danish women

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Cervical spinal cord injury after blunt assault: Just a pain in the neck?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Ventral hernia and pregnancy: A systematic review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  1. Closure of the fascial defect during laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Incidence of Inguinal Hernia after Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Kønsmodificerende kirurgi i Danmark

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Outcome Measures in Gender-Confirming Chest Surgery: A Systematic Scoping Review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: This systematic review investigates newer generation 3-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy vs 2-dimensional (2D) laparoscopy in terms of error rating, performance time, and subjective assessment as early comparisons have shown contradictory results due to technological shortcomings.

DATA SOURCES: This systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing newer generation 3D-laparoscopy with 2D-laparoscopy were included through searches in Pubmed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials database.

CONCLUSIONS: Of 643 articles, 13 RCTs were included, of which 2 were clinical trials. Nine of 13 trials (69%) and 10 of 13 trials (77%) found a significant reduction in performance time and error, respectively, with the use of 3D-laparoscopy. Overall, 3D-laparoscopy was found to be superior or equal to 2D-laparoscopy. All trials featuring subjective evaluation found a superiority of 3D-laparoscopy. More clinical RCTs are still awaited for the convincing results to be reproduced.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftAmerican Journal of Surgery
Vol/bind213
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)159-170
ISSN0002-9610
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jan. 2017

ID: 49190233