Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Loss of awareness of hypoglycaemia is the major risk factor for severe hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes. Three methods for assessment of self-reported awareness have been validated and used more widely: the Gold, the Clarke and the Pedersen-Bjergaard classification. Comparisons between the methods are hampered by the latter operating with three classes, whereas the other methods are bimodal. We have therefore updated the Pedersen-Bjergaard classification and here present a comparison of the three methods.
METHODS: Adult people with type 1 diabetes (n = 325) completed a validated questionnaire. Hypoglycaemia awareness was self-reported by the three methods: Gold, Clarke and Pedersen-Bjergaard scores. The latter was updated by renaming the previous "impaired" class to "intermediate".
RESULTS: A total of 24%, 17% and 14% of patients were classified as having loss of awareness by the Gold, Clarke and updated Pedersen-Bjergaard methods, respectively, with reasonably good agreement and all with increased rates of severe hypoglycaemia. The latter classified 43% with normal and 43% with intermediate awareness and low and average rate of severe hypoglycaemia, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The three classifications identified people with loss of awareness with a reasonably high degree of concordance. In contrast to the others, the updated Pedersen-Bjergaard method identified groups with normal and intermediate awareness with clinically significant different risks of severe hypoglycaemia.
FUNDING: The Research Foundation of Nordsjællands Hospital and the Beckett Foundation.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.
Originalsprog | Engelsk |
---|---|
Artikelnummer | A01220041 |
Tidsskrift | Danish Medical Journal |
Vol/bind | 69 |
Udgave nummer | 9 |
Antal sider | 9 |
ISSN | 1603-9629 |
Status | Udgivet - 25 aug. 2022 |