TY - JOUR
T1 - The uncontrollability of relational indifference in blended workgroups
AU - Kristensen, Anette Kaagaard
AU - Kristensen, Martin Lund
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited.
PY - 2022/12/7
Y1 - 2022/12/7
N2 - Purpose: This paper aims to examine how temporaries’ experience and perception of encounters with permanent members’ relational indifference affect the social relations in blended workgroups. Design/methodology/approach: Constructivist grounded theory study based on 15 semi-structured interviews with first- and third-year nursing students in clinical internships at somatic hospital wards was used. Findings: The authors identified two themes around organizational alienation. Temporaries expected and hoped to experience resonance in their interactions with permanent members, which drove them to make an extra effort when confronted with permanents’ relational indifference. Temporaries felt insignificant, meaningless and unworthy, causing them to adopt a relationless mode of relating, feeling alienated and adapting their expectations and hopes. Practical implications: Relational indifference is, unlike relational repulsion, problematic to target directly through intervention policies as organizations would inflict a more profound alienation on temporaries. Originality/value: Unlike previous research on blended workgroups, which has predominantly focused on relational repulsion, this paper contributes to understanding how relational indifference affects temporaries’ mode of relating to permanent.
AB - Purpose: This paper aims to examine how temporaries’ experience and perception of encounters with permanent members’ relational indifference affect the social relations in blended workgroups. Design/methodology/approach: Constructivist grounded theory study based on 15 semi-structured interviews with first- and third-year nursing students in clinical internships at somatic hospital wards was used. Findings: The authors identified two themes around organizational alienation. Temporaries expected and hoped to experience resonance in their interactions with permanent members, which drove them to make an extra effort when confronted with permanents’ relational indifference. Temporaries felt insignificant, meaningless and unworthy, causing them to adopt a relationless mode of relating, feeling alienated and adapting their expectations and hopes. Practical implications: Relational indifference is, unlike relational repulsion, problematic to target directly through intervention policies as organizations would inflict a more profound alienation on temporaries. Originality/value: Unlike previous research on blended workgroups, which has predominantly focused on relational repulsion, this paper contributes to understanding how relational indifference affects temporaries’ mode of relating to permanent.
KW - Blended workgroups
KW - Organizational alienation
KW - Organizational ostracism
KW - Resonance
KW - Temporary work
KW - Temporary workers
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85116383924&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/IJOA-12-2020-2547
DO - 10.1108/IJOA-12-2020-2547
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85116383924
SN - 1934-8835
VL - 30
SP - 1844
EP - 1855
JO - INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL ANALYSIS
JF - INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL ANALYSIS
IS - 6
ER -