The totally extraperitoneal method versus Lichtenstein's technique for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses of randomized clinical trials

G G Koning; J Wetterslev; C J H M van Laarhoven; Frederik Keus

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052599

The totally extraperitoneal method versus Lichtenstein's technique for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses of randomized clinical trials

G G Koning, J Wetterslev, C J H M van Laarhoven, Frederik Keus

Copenhagen Trial Unit Rigshospitalet

62 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

Lichtenstein's technique is considered the reference technique for inguinal hernia repair. Recent trials suggest that the totally extraperitoneal (TEP) technique may lead to reduced proportions of chronic pain. A systematic review evaluating the benefits and harms of the TEP compared with Lichtenstein's technique is needed.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	P L o S One
Vol/bind	8
Udgave nummer	1
Sider (fra-til)	e52599
ISSN	1932-6203
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052599
Status	Udgivet - 2013

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1371/journal.pone.0052599

Citationsformater

The totally extraperitoneal method versus Lichtenstein's technique for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses of randomized clinical trials. / Koning, G G; Wetterslev, J; van Laarhoven, C J H M et al.
I: P L o S One, Bind 8, Nr. 1, 2013, s. e52599.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review

@article{03ae802d9a7d43a99db8e6fa082b4f70,

title = "The totally extraperitoneal method versus Lichtenstein's technique for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses of randomized clinical trials",

abstract = "Lichtenstein's technique is considered the reference technique for inguinal hernia repair. Recent trials suggest that the totally extraperitoneal (TEP) technique may lead to reduced proportions of chronic pain. A systematic review evaluating the benefits and harms of the TEP compared with Lichtenstein's technique is needed.",

author = "Koning, {G G} and J Wetterslev and {van Laarhoven}, {C J H M} and Frederik Keus",

year = "2013",

doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0052599",

language = "English",

volume = "8",

pages = "e52599",

journal = "P L o S One",

issn = "1932-6203",

publisher = "Public Library of Science",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The totally extraperitoneal method versus Lichtenstein's technique for inguinal hernia repair

T2 - a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses of randomized clinical trials

AU - Koning, G G

AU - Wetterslev, J

AU - van Laarhoven, C J H M

AU - Keus, Frederik

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Lichtenstein's technique is considered the reference technique for inguinal hernia repair. Recent trials suggest that the totally extraperitoneal (TEP) technique may lead to reduced proportions of chronic pain. A systematic review evaluating the benefits and harms of the TEP compared with Lichtenstein's technique is needed.

AB - Lichtenstein's technique is considered the reference technique for inguinal hernia repair. Recent trials suggest that the totally extraperitoneal (TEP) technique may lead to reduced proportions of chronic pain. A systematic review evaluating the benefits and harms of the TEP compared with Lichtenstein's technique is needed.

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0052599

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0052599

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 23349689

SN - 1932-6203

VL - 8

SP - e52599

JO - P L o S One

JF - P L o S One

IS - 1

ER -

The totally extraperitoneal method versus Lichtenstein's technique for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses of randomized clinical trials

Abstract

Adgang til dokumentet

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater