Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
E-pub ahead of print

The tolerance of anisometropia

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Retinal drawings and distance to foveal involvement in retinal detachments

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Development and validation of a multiple-choice questionnaire-based theoretical test in direct ophthalmoscopy

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Periocular necrotizing soft tissue infection in Greater Copenhagen

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Detection of visual field defects by opticians - with Damato Multifixation Campimetry Online

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Retinal drawings and distance to foveal involvement in retinal detachments

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. The Danish Rural Eye Study: prevalence of strabismus among 3785 Danish adults - a population-based cross-sectional study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Real-World Impact of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Metastatic Uveal Melanoma

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Correlation of virtual reality performance with real-life cataract surgery performance

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. Predicting visual acuity deterioration and radiation-induced toxicities after brachytherapy for choroidal melanomas

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

Purpose: This study examines aniseikonia, Aniseikonia tolerance range (ATR), anisometropia and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in an anisometropic population compared with a non-anisometropic population. The relationship between anisometropia and aniseikonia is determined, and the correlations between aniseikonia, anisometropia and ATR versus PRO are described. Methods: One hundred and twenty-three patients with IOL-induced anisometropia ≥1 dioptre (D) (the anisometropic group) and 17 patients who had IOL-induced anisometropia <1 D (the control group) were included. Best corrected visual acuity, aniseikonia, ATR and stereoacuity were examined, and two questionnaires were completed: convergence insufficiency symptom survey (CISS) and Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-39). Results: One hundred and thirteen patients had anisometropia >1 and <3 D, and 10 patients had anisometropia >3 D. There was no difference in PRO between the control group and the anisometropic group (Mann–Whitney, p-values VFQ: 0.96, CISS: 0.06). There was no correlation between anisometropia and PRO (Spearman's rank correlation test p-values: VFQ: 0.54, CISS: 0.57). Patients with low ATR were more sensitive towards anisometropia and had lower PRO than patients with high ATR (Mann–Whitney, p-values: VFQ: 0.0008, CISS: 0.11). A large tolerance of aniseikonia was observed. Conclusion: No correlation between PRO and anisometropia or aniseikonia was found. Patients with low ATR are at risk of visual complaints if they are exposed to IOL-induced anisometropia. ATR might be a future screening tool in cataract patients.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer1755-3768
TidsskriftActa Ophthalmologica
Sider (fra-til)1-9
Antal sider9
ISSN1755-375X
DOI
StatusE-pub ahead of print - 2020

ID: 58969167