Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

The relationship between rowing-related low back pain and rowing biomechanics: a systematic review

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  1. Infographic. Benefits and harms of exercise therapy in people with multimorbidity

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debatForskningpeer review

  2. 2021 consensus statement for preventing and managing low back pain in elite and subelite adult rowers

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Prevalence and risk factors for back pain in sports: a systematic review with meta-analysis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  4. Treating low back pain in athletes: a systematic review with meta-analysis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  1. 2021 consensus statement for preventing and managing low back pain in elite and subelite adult rowers

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Prevalence and risk factors for back pain in sports: a systematic review with meta-analysis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  3. Treating low back pain in athletes: a systematic review with meta-analysis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  • Frank James Nugent
  • Anders Vinther
  • Alison McGregor
  • Jane S Thornton
  • Kellie Wilkie
  • Fiona Wilson
Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is common in rowers. Understanding rowing biomechanics may help facilitate prevention and improve rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVES: To define the kinematics and muscle activity of rowers and to compare with rowers with current or LBP history.

DESIGN: Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES: EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science and Scopus from inception to December 2019. Grey literature was searched.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Experimental and non-experimental designs.

METHODS: Primary outcomes were kinematics and muscle activity. Modified Quality Index (QI) checklist was used.

RESULTS: 22 studies were included (429 participants). Modified QI score had a mean of 16.7/28 points (range: 15-21). Thirteen studies investigated kinematics and nine investigated muscle activity. Rowers without LBP ('healthy') have distinct kinematics (neutral or anterior pelvic rotation at the catch, greater hip range of motion, flatter low back spinal position at the finish) and muscle activity (trunk extensor dominant with less flexor activity). Rowers with LBP had relatively greater posterior pelvic rotation at the catch, greater hip extension at the finish and less efficient trunk muscle activity. In both groups fatigue results in increased lumbar spine flexion at the catch, which is greater on the ergometer. There is insufficient evidence to recommend one ergometer type (fixed vs dynamic) over the other to avoid LBP. Trunk asymmetries are not associated with LBP in rowers.

CONCLUSION: Improving clinicians' and coaches' understanding of safe and effective rowing biomechanics, particularly of the spine, pelvis and hips may be an important strategy in reducing incidence and burden of LBP.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftBritish Journal of Sports Medicine
Vol/bind55
Udgave nummer11
Sider (fra-til)616-630
Antal sider15
ISSN0306-3674
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 1 jun. 2021

Bibliografisk note

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

ID: 62294787