Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

The prognostic impact of incidental prostate cancer following radical cystoprostatectomy: a nationwide analysis

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Robotic versus laparoscopic urological surgery: incidence of reoperation and complications

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Successful extraction of sperm cells after autologous bone marrow transplant: a case report

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. National incidence and survival of patients with non-invasive papillary urothelial carcinoma: a Danish population study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Implantation of the argus sling in a hard-to-treat patient group with urinary stress incontinence

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Active Surveillance Versus Radical Prostatectomy in Favorable-risk Localized Prostate Cancer

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Risk of cardiovascular events in men treated for prostate cancer compared with prostate cancer-free men

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Prostate Artery Embolization for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Men Unfit for Surgery

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. 5hmC Level Predicts Biochemical Failure Following Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Patients with ERG Negative Tumors

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: To determine the prevalence and prognostic impact of incidental prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical cystoprostatectomy.

METHODS: A nationwide population-based study of incidental prostate cancer diagnosed following radical cystoprostatectomy. Information on vital status, Gleason score, positive and negative tumor margins, pT-category and subsequent prostate cancer therapies were obtained from the Danish Prostate Cancer Registry and by manual chart review.

RESULTS: A total of 1,450 men who underwent radical cystoprostatectomy in Denmark from 1995-2011 were identified. Forty-six men were excluded from analysis, thus 1,404 patients were eligible. The median follow-up was 7.8 years. A total of 466 (33.2%) had incidental prostate cancer diagnosed. No statistical differences in 10- and 15-year cumulative overall mortality were observed when comparing men with, or without, incidental prostate cancer. In men diagnosed with incidental prostate cancer, neither Gleason score, positive surgical margins or locally advanced prostate cancer (pT3-4) was associated with mortality. Only 0.9% received post-operative prostate cancer-related treatment.

CONCLUSION: In this population-based cohort of patients with incidental prostate cancer diagnosed at radical cystoprostatectomy, we found no impact of incidental prostate cancer on overall mortality, regardless of Gleason score, surgical margin status and pathological T-category. Patients diagnosed with incidental prostate cancer following radical cystoprostatectomy are unlikely to benefit from additional follow-up.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftScandinavian Journal of Urology
Vol/bind52
Udgave nummer5-6
Sider (fra-til)358-363
Antal sider6
ISSN2168-1805
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 10 jan. 2019

ID: 56218523