Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

The Metacognitive Anger Processing (MAP) Scale - Validation in a Mixed Clinical and a Forensic In-Patient Sample

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Rumination-focused cognitive behaviour therapy for non-responsive chronic depression: an uncontrolled group study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. The Metacognitive Anger Processing (MAP) Scale: Preliminary Testing

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Level of alexithymia as a measure of personality dysfunction in avoidant personality disorder

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. National Klinisk Retningslinje for Vanskeligt Behandlelig depression

    Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til rapportFormidling

  3. The PTSD help app in a Danish PTSD population: research protocol of a randomized controlled feasibility trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. National klinik retningslinje om vanskelig behandelig depression

    Publikation: Bog/antologi/afhandling/rapportRapportForskning

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: The metacognitive approach by Wells and colleagues has gained empirical support with a broad range of symptoms. The Metacognitive Anger Processing (MAP) scale was developed to provide a metacognitive measure on anger (Moeller, 2016). In the preliminary validation, three components were identified (positive beliefs, negative beliefs and rumination) to be positively correlated with the anger.

AIMS: To validate the MAP in a sample of mixed clinical patients (n = 88) and a sample of male forensic patients (n = 54).

METHOD: The MAP was administered together with measures of metacognition, anger, rumination, anxiety and depressive symptoms.

RESULTS: The MAP showed acceptable scalability and excellent reliability. Convergent validity was evidenced using the general metacognitive measure (MCQ-30), and concurrent validity was supported using two different anger measures (STAXI-2 and NAS).

CONCLUSIONS: The MAP has promising potential to assess anger regulation problems by providing a framework on angry rumination as well as the belief structures that proposedly drive the selection of this maladaptive processing strategy as suggested in the metacognitive model. These findings may have implications for clinical interventions. For example, conducting functional analyses on anger rumination could increase the understanding of dysregulated anger processing and lead to new interventions focused on shifting thinking style.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftBehavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
Vol/bind47
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)67-80
Antal sider14
ISSN1352-4658
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 25 mar. 2018

ID: 53649064