The Low-Risk TAVR Trials - A Critical Appraisal of the Current Landscape

Troels Højsgaard Jørgensen, Hans Gustav Hørsted Thyregod, Stefan Blankenberg, Martin Leon, Lars Sondergaard, Bernard Prendergast, Ole De Backer*

*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Abstract

The low-risk TAVR vs SAVR RCTs - PARTNER-3, Evolut Low-Risk, DEDICATE, and NOTION-2 - demonstrate that TAVR is at least as effective as SAVR in terms of early mortality and disabling stroke, although outcomes varied across studies. The excellent outcomes observed in the PARTNER-3 trial reflect the highly selected patient population, while the NOTION-2 trial highlights the challenges posed by anatomical variations, such as bicuspid aortic valves (AV). These findings highlight the importance of a personalized approach guided by a multidisciplinary Heart Team, taking into account both clinical and anatomical aspects when choosing between TAVR and SAVR. Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02825134.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftAmerican Heart Journal
Vol/bind291
Sider (fra-til)10-13
Antal sider4
ISSN0002-8703
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jan. 2026

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'The Low-Risk TAVR Trials - A Critical Appraisal of the Current Landscape'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater