TY - JOUR
T1 - The Influence of Profession, Experience and Geographical Region on Intra- and Postoperative Opioid Practice in Denmark
T2 - A Post Hoc Analysis of the OPIAID Survey
AU - Tran, Trang Xuan Minh
AU - Wetterslev, Mik
AU - Nørskov, Anders Kehlet
AU - Meyhoff, Christian S
AU - Olsen, Markus Harboe
AU - Itenov, Theis Skovsgaard
AU - Mathiesen, Ole
AU - Karlsen, Anders Peder Højer
AU - OPI•AID Collaborator Group
N1 - © 2026 The Author(s). Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation.
PY - 2026/5
Y1 - 2026/5
N2 - BACKGROUND: Clinicians often administer opioids to manage postoperative pain, but with considerable variation in chosen opioid and dosing strategies. This post hoc analysis of a Danish nationwide survey assessed how profession, length of experience, and geographical region impact dosing in the intraoperative phase (end of surgery) and the postoperative phase (PACU) for postoperative control. METHODS: A 37-item online survey on opioid practice amongst anaesthesia personnel in Denmark (5 February-30 April 2024). Regression analyses compared intravenous morphine equivalent doses (MEQ) in eight clinical cases for three provider characteristics: profession (physician/nurse), length of experience (> < 10 years) and geographical region (five regions). We predefined differences ≥ 0.03 mg/kg MEQ as clinically relevant. We qualitatively described group differences in perioperative factors guiding dose adjustments, defining differences ≥ 10% as relevant. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 48% (2025/4187). In four intraoperative clinical cases, anaesthesiologists administered on average 0.04 mg/kg MEQ less than nurse anaesthetists (95% CI: 0.03 to 0.04, p < 0.001), considered clinically relevant. Respondents with short working experience (< 10 years) administered 0.01 mg/kg MEQ less (95% CI: 0.00 to 0.02, p = 0.001). Respondents in the North Denmark Region administered 0.07 mg/kg MEQ more than the national average of 0.32 mg/kg MEQ (p < 0.001), considered clinically relevant. In postoperative clinical cases, significant dosing differences between short versus long working experience were not considered clinically relevant. Clinically relevant differences in dose-adjusting factors existed between professions (preoperative opioid use, age, body weight, alcohol use, chronic pain, and ASA classification) and regions (chronic pain, body weight, preoperative opioid use, ASA classification, sedation, BMI, and nausea). CONCLUSION: Clinical profession and regional background contribute to variation in opioid dosing strategies. Nurse anaesthetists and respondents from the North Denmark Region administered significantly and clinically relevant higher doses of opioids. Clinically relevant differences existed between professions and regions regarding opioid dose-adjusting factors. EDITORIAL COMMENT: This secondary analysis of survey results from Denmark regarding opioid choices and dosing preferences for post-surgical analgesia focused on professional categories and regions within Denmark. Some apparent dosing preference differences were described between professional groups and also between regions.
AB - BACKGROUND: Clinicians often administer opioids to manage postoperative pain, but with considerable variation in chosen opioid and dosing strategies. This post hoc analysis of a Danish nationwide survey assessed how profession, length of experience, and geographical region impact dosing in the intraoperative phase (end of surgery) and the postoperative phase (PACU) for postoperative control. METHODS: A 37-item online survey on opioid practice amongst anaesthesia personnel in Denmark (5 February-30 April 2024). Regression analyses compared intravenous morphine equivalent doses (MEQ) in eight clinical cases for three provider characteristics: profession (physician/nurse), length of experience (> < 10 years) and geographical region (five regions). We predefined differences ≥ 0.03 mg/kg MEQ as clinically relevant. We qualitatively described group differences in perioperative factors guiding dose adjustments, defining differences ≥ 10% as relevant. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 48% (2025/4187). In four intraoperative clinical cases, anaesthesiologists administered on average 0.04 mg/kg MEQ less than nurse anaesthetists (95% CI: 0.03 to 0.04, p < 0.001), considered clinically relevant. Respondents with short working experience (< 10 years) administered 0.01 mg/kg MEQ less (95% CI: 0.00 to 0.02, p = 0.001). Respondents in the North Denmark Region administered 0.07 mg/kg MEQ more than the national average of 0.32 mg/kg MEQ (p < 0.001), considered clinically relevant. In postoperative clinical cases, significant dosing differences between short versus long working experience were not considered clinically relevant. Clinically relevant differences in dose-adjusting factors existed between professions (preoperative opioid use, age, body weight, alcohol use, chronic pain, and ASA classification) and regions (chronic pain, body weight, preoperative opioid use, ASA classification, sedation, BMI, and nausea). CONCLUSION: Clinical profession and regional background contribute to variation in opioid dosing strategies. Nurse anaesthetists and respondents from the North Denmark Region administered significantly and clinically relevant higher doses of opioids. Clinically relevant differences existed between professions and regions regarding opioid dose-adjusting factors. EDITORIAL COMMENT: This secondary analysis of survey results from Denmark regarding opioid choices and dosing preferences for post-surgical analgesia focused on professional categories and regions within Denmark. Some apparent dosing preference differences were described between professional groups and also between regions.
KW - Humans
KW - Denmark
KW - Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage
KW - Postoperative Pain/drug therapy
KW - Female
KW - Male
KW - Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data
KW - Surveys and Questionnaires
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Adult
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105034818318
U2 - 10.1111/aas.70222
DO - 10.1111/aas.70222
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 41923700
SN - 0001-5172
VL - 70
JO - Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
JF - Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
IS - 5
M1 - e70222
ER -