The GRADE approach is reproducible in assessing the quality of evidence of quantitative evidence syntheses

Reem A Mustafa; Nancy Santesso; Jan Brozek; Elie A Akl; Stephen D Walter; Geoff Norman; Mahan Kulasegaram; Robin Christensen; Gordon H Guyatt; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Stephanie Chang; Mohammad Hassan Murad; Gunn E Vist; Toby Lasserson; Gerald Gartlehner; Vijay Shukla; Xin Sun; Craig Whittington; Piet N Post; Eddy Lang; Kylie Thaler; Ilkka Kunnamo; Heidi Alenius; Joerg J Meerpohl; Ana C Alba; Immaculate F Nevis; Stephen Gentles; Marie-Chantal Ethier; Alonso Carrasco-Labra; Rasha Khatib; Gihad Nesrallah; Jamie Kroft; Amanda Selk; Romina Brignardello-Petersen; Holger J Schünemann

doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.004

The GRADE approach is reproducible in assessing the quality of evidence of quantitative evidence syntheses

Reem A Mustafa, Nancy Santesso, Jan Brozek, Elie A Akl, Stephen D Walter, Geoff Norman, Mahan Kulasegaram, Robin Christensen, Gordon H Guyatt, Yngve Falck-Ytter, Stephanie Chang, Mohammad Hassan Murad, Gunn E Vist, Toby Lasserson, Gerald Gartlehner, Vijay Shukla, Xin Sun, Craig Whittington, Piet N Post, Eddy LangKylie Thaler, Ilkka Kunnamo, Heidi Alenius, Joerg J Meerpohl, Ana C Alba, Immaculate F Nevis, Stephen Gentles, Marie-Chantal Ethier, Alonso Carrasco-Labra, Rasha Khatib, Gihad Nesrallah, Jamie Kroft, Amanda Selk, Romina Brignardello-Petersen, Holger J Schünemann

Parker Instituttet

305 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

We evaluated the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of assessing the quality of evidence (QoE) using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Vol/bind	66
Udgave nummer	7
Sider (fra-til)	736-42; quiz 742.e1-5
ISSN	0895-4356
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.004
Status	Udgivet - jul. 2013

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.004

Citationsformater

Mustafa, R. A., Santesso, N., Brozek, J., Akl, E. A., Walter, S. D., Norman, G., Kulasegaram, M., Christensen, R., Guyatt, G. H., Falck-Ytter, Y., Chang, S., Murad, M. H., Vist, G. E., Lasserson, T., Gartlehner, G., Shukla, V., Sun, X., Whittington, C., Post, P. N., ... Schünemann, H. J. (2013). The GRADE approach is reproducible in assessing the quality of evidence of quantitative evidence syntheses. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(7), 736-42; quiz 742.e1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.004

Mustafa, RA, Santesso, N, Brozek, J, Akl, EA, Walter, SD, Norman, G, Kulasegaram, M, Christensen, R, Guyatt, GH, Falck-Ytter, Y, Chang, S, Murad, MH, Vist, GE, Lasserson, T, Gartlehner, G, Shukla, V, Sun, X, Whittington, C, Post, PN, Lang, E, Thaler, K, Kunnamo, I, Alenius, H, Meerpohl, JJ, Alba, AC, Nevis, IF, Gentles, S, Ethier, M-C, Carrasco-Labra, A, Khatib, R, Nesrallah, G, Kroft, J, Selk, A, Brignardello-Petersen, R & Schünemann, HJ 2013, 'The GRADE approach is reproducible in assessing the quality of evidence of quantitative evidence syntheses', Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, bind 66, nr. 7, s. 736-42; quiz 742.e1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.004

@article{65a3e51f335849a79e27d050f3343b9b,

title = "The GRADE approach is reproducible in assessing the quality of evidence of quantitative evidence syntheses",

abstract = "We evaluated the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of assessing the quality of evidence (QoE) using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.",

keywords = "Canada, Evidence-Based Medicine, Humans, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Research Design, Self Care, Validation Studies as Topic",

author = "Mustafa, {Reem A} and Nancy Santesso and Jan Brozek and Akl, {Elie A} and Walter, {Stephen D} and Geoff Norman and Mahan Kulasegaram and Robin Christensen and Guyatt, {Gordon H} and Yngve Falck-Ytter and Stephanie Chang and Murad, {Mohammad Hassan} and Vist, {Gunn E} and Toby Lasserson and Gerald Gartlehner and Vijay Shukla and Xin Sun and Craig Whittington and Post, {Piet N} and Eddy Lang and Kylie Thaler and Ilkka Kunnamo and Heidi Alenius and Meerpohl, {Joerg J} and Alba, {Ana C} and Nevis, {Immaculate F} and Stephen Gentles and Marie-Chantal Ethier and Alonso Carrasco-Labra and Rasha Khatib and Gihad Nesrallah and Jamie Kroft and Amanda Selk and Romina Brignardello-Petersen and Sch{\"u}nemann, {Holger J}",

year = "2013",

month = jul,

doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.004",

language = "English",

volume = "66",

pages = "736--42; quiz 742.e1--5",

journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",

issn = "0895-4356",

publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The GRADE approach is reproducible in assessing the quality of evidence of quantitative evidence syntheses

AU - Mustafa, Reem A

AU - Santesso, Nancy

AU - Brozek, Jan

AU - Akl, Elie A

AU - Walter, Stephen D

AU - Norman, Geoff

AU - Kulasegaram, Mahan

AU - Christensen, Robin

AU - Guyatt, Gordon H

AU - Falck-Ytter, Yngve

AU - Chang, Stephanie

AU - Murad, Mohammad Hassan

AU - Vist, Gunn E

AU - Lasserson, Toby

AU - Gartlehner, Gerald

AU - Shukla, Vijay

AU - Sun, Xin

AU - Whittington, Craig

AU - Post, Piet N

AU - Lang, Eddy

AU - Thaler, Kylie

AU - Kunnamo, Ilkka

AU - Alenius, Heidi

AU - Meerpohl, Joerg J

AU - Alba, Ana C

AU - Nevis, Immaculate F

AU - Gentles, Stephen

AU - Ethier, Marie-Chantal

AU - Carrasco-Labra, Alonso

AU - Khatib, Rasha

AU - Nesrallah, Gihad

AU - Kroft, Jamie

AU - Selk, Amanda

AU - Brignardello-Petersen, Romina

AU - Schünemann, Holger J

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - We evaluated the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of assessing the quality of evidence (QoE) using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

AB - We evaluated the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of assessing the quality of evidence (QoE) using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

KW - Canada

KW - Evidence-Based Medicine

KW - Humans

KW - Practice Guidelines as Topic

KW - Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

KW - Questionnaires

KW - Reproducibility of Results

KW - Research Design

KW - Self Care

KW - Validation Studies as Topic

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.004

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 23623694

SN - 0895-4356

VL - 66

SP - 736-42; quiz 742.e1-5

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

IS - 7

ER -

The GRADE approach is reproducible in assessing the quality of evidence of quantitative evidence syntheses

Abstract

Adgang til dokumentet

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater