Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

The Dutch Hip and Groin Outcome Score: Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation According to the COSMIN Checklist.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Is Bony Hip Morphology Associated With Range of Motion and Strength in Asymptomatic Male Soccer Players?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. A Standardized "Rescue" Exercise Program for Symptomatic Flare-up of Knee Osteoarthritis: Description and Safety Considerations

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery Is on the Rise-But What Is the Next Step?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • Igor Tak
  • Marsha Tijssen
  • Thijs Schamp
  • Inger Sierevelt
  • Kristian Thorborg
  • Gino Kerkhoffs
  • Janine Stubbe
  • Anne-Marie van Beijsterveldt
  • Daniel Haverkamp
Vis graf over relationer
Study Design Clinical measurement. Background The Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) was developed as a patient-reported outcome measure for young, active individuals with hip and groin pain. Objectives To cross-culturally adapt and validate a Dutch version of the HAGOS. Methods Adaptation and validation were performed according to existing guidelines and the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments checklist. Physically active (Tegner activity score of greater than 2) adults between 18 and 50 years of age with hip and groin pain (numeric pain score of 1 or greater) were included in the study. Reliability (test-retest, internal consistency) was assessed in clinically stable patients. Construct validity was determined by calculating Spearman correlations between the scores on the HAGOS and scores on the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions subscales. Fifteen hypotheses were defined a priori. Interpretability was considered good when floor and ceiling effects were present in less than 15% of individuals. Results A Dutch version of the HAGOS was created. Its reliability was tested in 129 individuals and its validity in 194 participants. Test-retest reliability was good (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.83-0.87). Internal consistency was good (Cronbach alpha = .81-.92). Construct validity was considered good: 13 of 15 (87%) hypotheses were confirmed. Floor effects (21%) were present for the physical activity subscale. Conclusion The Dutch HAGOS is a reliable and valid patient-reported outcome measure and performs similarly to the original version in its target population. It can be used in clinical as well as research settings. Presence of floor effects should be considered for the physical activity subscale. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2018;48(4):299-306. doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.7883.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftThe Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy
Vol/bind48
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)299-306
Antal sider8
ISSN1938-1344
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2018

ID: 55778199