Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

The construct validity of the Major Depression Inventory: A Rasch analysis of a self-rating scale in primary care

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Detection of illness worry in the general population: A specific item on illness rumination improves the Whiteley Index

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Self-reported health status and the associated risk of mortality in heart failure: The DANISH trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Mental health is a risk factor for poor outcomes in cardiac patients: Findings from the national DenHeart survey

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. DenHeart: Differences in physical and mental health across cardiac diagnoses at hospital discharge

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • Marie Germund Nielsen
  • Eva Ørnbøl
  • Mogens Vestergaard
  • Per Bech
  • Kaj Aage Sparle Christensen
Vis graf over relationer

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the measurement properties of the ten-item Major Depression Inventory when used on clinical suspicion in general practice by performing a Rasch analysis.

METHODS: General practitioners asked consecutive persons to respond to the web-based Major Depression Inventory on clinical suspicion of depression. We included 22 practices and 245 persons. Rasch analysis was performed using RUMM2030 software. The Rasch model fit suggests that all items contribute to a single underlying trait (defined as internal construct validity). Mokken analysis was used to test dimensionality and scalability.

RESULTS: Our Rasch analysis showed misfit concerning the sleep and appetite items (items 9 and 10). The response categories were disordered for eight items. After modifying the original six-point to a four-point scoring system for all items, we achieved ordered response categories for all ten items. The person separation reliability was acceptable (0.82) for the initial model. Dimensionality testing did not support combining the ten items to create a total score. The scale appeared to be well targeted to this clinical sample. No significant differential item functioning was observed for gender, age, work status and education. The Rasch and Mokken analyses revealed two dimensions, but the Major Depression Inventory showed fit to one scale if items 9 and 10 were excluded.

CONCLUSION: Our study indicated scalability problems in the current version of the Major Depression Inventory. The conducted analysis revealed better statistical fit when items 9 and 10 were excluded.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Psychosomatic Research
Vol/bind97
Sider (fra-til)70-81
Antal sider12
ISSN0022-3999
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jun. 2017

ID: 51480815