Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital

The complete European guidelines on phenylketonuria: diagnosis and treatment

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review


  1. An ontological foundation for ocular phenotypes and rare eye diseases

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLetterForskningpeer review

  2. Research activity and capability in the European reference network MetabERN

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Clinical, biochemical and genetic spectrum of 70 patients with ACAD9 deficiency: is riboflavin supplementation effective?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Migalastat improves diarrhea in patients with Fabry disease: clinical-biomarker correlations from the phase 3 FACETS trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • A M J van Wegberg
  • A MacDonald
  • K Ahring
  • A Bélanger-Quintana
  • N Blau
  • A M Bosch
  • A Burlina
  • J Campistol
  • F Feillet
  • M Giżewska
  • S C Huijbregts
  • S Kearney
  • V Leuzzi
  • F Maillot
  • A C Muntau
  • M van Rijn
  • F Trefz
  • J H Walter
  • F J van Spronsen
Vis graf over relationer

Phenylketonuria (PKU) is an autosomal recessive inborn error of phenylalanine metabolism caused by deficiency in the enzyme phenylalanine hydroxylase that converts phenylalanine into tyrosine. If left untreated, PKU results in increased phenylalanine concentrations in blood and brain, which cause severe intellectual disability, epilepsy and behavioural problems. PKU management differs widely across Europe and therefore these guidelines have been developed aiming to optimize and standardize PKU care. Professionals from 10 different European countries developed the guidelines according to the AGREE (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation) method. Literature search, critical appraisal and evidence grading were conducted according to the SIGN (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network) method. The Delphi-method was used when there was no or little evidence available. External consultants reviewed the guidelines. Using these methods 70 statements were formulated based on the highest quality evidence available. The level of evidence of most recommendations is C or D. Although study designs and patient numbers are sub-optimal, many statements are convincing, important and relevant. In addition, knowledge gaps are identified which require further research in order to direct better care for the future.

TidsskriftOrphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)162
StatusUdgivet - 12 okt. 2017

ID: 52177911