Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

The challenges of boundary spanners in supporting inter-organizational collaboration in primary care – a qualitative study of general practitioners in a new role

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Nonspecific symptoms dominate at first contact to emergency healthcare services among cases with invasive meningococcal disease

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Epstein-Barr virus and its association with disease - a review of relevance to general practice

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  3. General practitioners uses and perceptions of voluntary electronic feedback on treatment outcomes - a qualitative study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer
BACKGROUND:
The visions of more integrated care have created new roles and accountabilities for organizations and professionals. Thus, professionals are increasingly expected to engage in boundary spanning activities in order to facilitate inter-organizational and inter-sectoral collaboration. However, this task can be difficult for individual actors and it is important to investigate the work and challenges of boundary spanners in various settings. This study explores the challenges related to a new boundary spanning role for general practitioners employed to facilitate collaboration between the municipalities and general practice.
METHODS:
The study is based on semi-structured interviews with ten general practitioners acting as municipal practice consultants in the Capital Region of Denmark. The transcribed interviews were analyzed in several steps organizing the material into a set of coherent and distinct categories covering the different types of challenges experienced by the informants.
RESULTS:
The main challenges of the general practitioners acting as boundary spanners were: 1) defining and negotiating the role in terms of tasks and competencies; 2) representing and mobilizing colleagues in general practice; 3) navigating in an unfamiliar organizational context.
CONCLUSIONS:
The results support previous studies in emphasizing the difficult and multifaceted character of the boundary spanning role. While some of these challenges are not easily dealt with due to their structural causes, organizations employing boundary spanners should take note of these challenges and support their boundary spanners with matching resources and competencies.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftB M C Family Practice
Vol/bind16
Udgave nummer17
ISSN1471-2296
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 13 feb. 2015

ID: 46353274