Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

The association between self-reported health status and adverse events: a comparison among coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Assessing baseline dependency of anchor-based minimal important change (MIC): don't stratify on the baseline score!

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. The longitudinal validity of proxy-reported CHU9D

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Development and content validation of a questionnaire measuring patient empowerment in cancer follow-up

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. International validation of the EORTC CAT Core: a new adaptive instrument for measuring core quality of life domains in cancer

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Reply: Accelerometers: A Useful Technology in HF Research?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Impella RP Versus Pharmacologic Vasoactive Treatment in Profound Cardiogenic Shock due to Right Ventricular Failure

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

PURPOSE: While several studies have investigated clinical outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), studies investigating self-reported health and the association with adverse outcomes are limited. Thus, the aim was to investigate differences in health-related quality of life (HRQoL), anxiety and depression at discharge and the association with a composite endpoint of the first event of acute cardiac readmission, revascularisation or 1-year mortality among patients undergoing CABG vs. PCI.

METHODS: Data from the national cohort study, DenHeart, were used, including measures of HRQoL; EuroQoL-5D-5L (EQ-5D Index Score and VAS) and HeartQoL (Global, Physical and Emotional), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS) and register-based follow-up. A total of 7000 patients were included (CABG n = 652, PCI n = 6348) (median age 65, 75% men). Cox Proportional Hazard models were performed among a propensity-matched population of responders (n = 520).

RESULTS: HRQoL was significantly better among patients undergoing PCI vs. CABG, but with no differences in time to readmission or revascularisation. HRQoL, anxiety and depression were significantly associated with the risk of the composite endpoint among the PCI group (Hazard Ratio, HR (95% confidence intervals, CI) [EQ-5D index score 3.07 (1.67-5.67), EQ-5D VAS 0.97 (0.96-0.99), HeartQol Global 0.61 (0.38-0.95), HeartQol Emotional 0.56 (0.39-0.80), HADS-D ≥ 8 3.12 (1.61-6.01), HADS-A ≥ 8 2.08 (1.14-3.80)].

CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing PCI reported better HRQoL at discharge compared with patients undergoing CABG, whereas readmission rates were similar. Self-reported health was associated with the risk of adverse events among patients undergoing PCI, but not among patients undergoing CABG.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01926145.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation
Vol/bind29
Udgave nummer11
Sider (fra-til)3017-3029
Antal sider13
ISSN0962-9343
DOI
StatusUdgivet - nov. 2020

ID: 62110635