Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

The appraisal of chronic stress and the development of the metabolic syndrome: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Habitual activity associates with lower fasting and greater glucose-induced GLP-1 response in men

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Gluco-metabolic effects of oral and intravenous alcohol administration in men

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Metabolic effects of dopamine agonists in patients with prolactinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Measurement of urinary 5-HIAA: correlation between spot versus 24-h urine collection

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. GIP-induced vasodilation in human adipose tissue involves capillary recruitment

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

Chronic psychosocial stress has been proposed as a risk factor for the development of the metabolic syndrome (MES). This review gives a systematic overview of prospective cohort studies investigating chronic psychosocial stress as a risk factor for incident MES and the individual elements of MES. Thirty-nine studies were included. An association between chronic psychosocial stress and the development of MES was generally supported. Regarding the four elements of MES: i) weight gain: the prospective studies supported etiological roles for relationship stress, perceived stress, and distress, while the studies on work-related stress (WS) showed conflicting results; ii) dyslipidemi: too few studies on psychosocial stress as a risk factor for dyslipidemia were available to draw a conclusion; however, a trend toward a positive association was present; iii) type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2): prospective studies supported perceived stress and distress as risk factors for the development of DM2 among men, but not among women, while WS was generally not supported as a risk factor among neither men nor women; iv) hypertension: marital stress and perceived stress might have an influence on blood pressure (BP), while no association was found regarding distress. Evaluating WS the results were equivocal and indicated that different types of WS affected the BP differently between men and women. In conclusion, a longitudinal association between chronic psychosocial stress and the development of MES seems present. However, the number of studies with sufficient quality is limited and the design of the studies is substantially heterogeneous.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftEndocrine Connections
Vol/bind3
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)R55-80
ISSN2049-3614
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jun. 2014

ID: 44971729