Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
E-pub ahead of print

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in Children and Adolescents

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. The Problem of Same-Rater Bias

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Parent Training for Preschool ADHD in Routine, Specialist Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Parental Rheumatoid Arthritis and Autism Spectrum Disorders in Offspring: A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

OBJECTIVE: To assess benefits and harms of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) versus no intervention or versus other interventions for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).

METHOD: We searched for randomized clinical trials of CBT for pediatric OCD. Primary outcomes were OCD severity, serious adverse events, and level of functioning. Secondary outcomes were quality of life and adverse events. Remission from OCD was included as an exploratory outcome. We assessed risk of bias and evaluated the certainty of the evidence with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation.

RESULTS: We included nine trials (N=645) comparing CBT with no intervention and three trials (N=146) comparing CBT with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Compared with no intervention, CBT decreased OCD severity (mean difference [MD]=-8.51, 95% CI -10.84 to -6.18, p<.00001, low certainty), improved level of functioning (patient-rated: standardized MD [SMD]=-0.90, 95% CI -1.19 to -0.62, p<.00001, very low certainty; parent-rated: SMD=-0.68, 95% CI -1.12 to -0.23, p=.003, very low certainty) had similar proportions of participants with adverse events (risk ratio=1.06, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.22, p=0.39, GRADE: low certainty), and was associated with reduced risk of still having OCD (risk ratio=0.50, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.67, p<.00001, very low certainty). We had insufficient data to assess the effect of CBT versus no intervention on serious adverse events and quality of life. Compared with SSRIs, CBT led to similar decreases in OCD severity (MD=-0.75, 95% CI -3.79 to 2.29, p=.63, GRADE: very low certainty) and was associated with similar risk of still having OCD (risk ratio=0.85, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.09, p=.20, very low certainty). We had insufficient data to assess the effect of CBT versus SSRIs on serious adverse events, level of functioning, quality of life, and adverse events.

CONCLUSION: CBT may be more effective than no intervention and comparable to SSRIs for pediatric OCD, but we are very uncertain about the effect estimates.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
ISSN0890-8567
DOI
StatusE-pub ahead of print - 4 okt. 2019

Bibliografisk note

Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.

ID: 58180725