Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Systematic fast-track transition from oncological treatment to dyadic specialized palliative home care: DOMUS - a randomized clinical trial

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. A Weighted Genetic Risk Score of Adult Glioma Susceptibility Loci Associated with Pediatric Brain Tumor Risk

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Chronic Diseases in High-Cost Users of Hospital, Primary Care, and Prescription Medication in the Capital Region of Denmark

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Depressive symptoms and mental health-related quality of life in adolescence and young adulthood after early parental death

    Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningpeer review

  4. Community-based football in men with prostate cancer: 1-year follow-up on a pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND:: The focus of specialized palliative care is to improve quality of life for patients with incurable cancer and their relatives including an increased opportunity to make their own choice of place of care and death.

AIM:: To investigate whether a systematic fast-track transition from oncological treatment to specialized palliative care at home for patients with incurable cancer reinforced with a psychological dyadic intervention could result in more time spent at home and death at home. Secondary aims were to investigate effects on quality of life, symptomatology and survival.

DESIGN:: A prospective, single-centre, randomized controlled trial ( Clinicaltrials.gov : NCT01885637).

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS:: In all, 340 patients with incurable cancer and no or limited antineoplastic treatment options.

RESULTS:: No statistically significant difference was found regarding number of deaths (4%, p = 0.460) and time spent at home (3%, p = 0.491). The secondary outcomes indicated that the intervention resulted in improved quality of life (-11.6 ± 25.5, p = 0.005, effect size = -0.44, 95% confidence interval = -0.77; -0.11), social functioning (-15.8 ± 31.4, p = 0.001, effect size = -0.50, 95% confidence interval = -0.84; -0.17) and emotional functioning (-9.1 ± 21.2, p = 0.039, effect size = -0.43, 95% confidence interval = -0.76; -0.10) after 6 months. A linear mixed-effect regression model confirmed a possible effect on emotional and social functioning at 6 months. Regarding survival, no differences were found between groups ( p = 0.605). No adverse effects were seen as consequence of the intervention.

CONCLUSIONS:: The main findings indicated that the intervention had no effect on time spent at home or place of death. However, the intervention resulted in a weak improvement of quality of life, social functioning and emotional functioning after 6 months.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftPalliative Medicine
Vol/bind33
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)135-149
Antal sider15
ISSN0269-2163
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2019

ID: 55863922