Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Guidelines on the Management of Critically Ill Adults with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • Waleed Alhazzani
  • Morten Hylander Møller
  • Yaseen M Arabi
  • Mark Loeb
  • Michelle Ng Gong
  • Eddy Fan
  • Simon Oczkowski
  • Mitchell M Levy
  • Lennie Derde
  • Amy Dzierba
  • Bin Du
  • Michael Aboodi
  • Hannah Wunsch
  • Maurizio Cecconi
  • Younsuck Koh
  • Daniel S Chertow
  • Kathryn Maitland
  • Fayez Alshamsi
  • Emilie Belley-Cote
  • Massimiliano Greco
  • Matthew Laundy
  • Jill S Morgan
  • Jozef Kesecioglu
  • Allison McGeer
  • Leonard Mermel
  • Manoj J Mammen
  • Paul E Alexander
  • Amy Arrington
  • John E Centofanti
  • Giuseppe Citerio
  • Bandar Baw
  • Ziad A Memish
  • Naomi Hammond
  • Frederick G Hayden
  • Laura Evans
  • Andrew Rhodes
Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the cause of a rapidly spreading illness, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), affecting thousands of people around the world. Urgent guidance for clinicians caring for the sickest of these patients is needed.

METHODS: We formed a panel of 36 experts from 12 countries. All panel members completed the World Health Organization conflict of interest disclosure form. The panel proposed 53 questions that are relevant to the management of COVID-19 in the ICU. We searched the literature for direct and indirect evidence on the management of COVID-19 in critically ill patients in the ICU. We identified relevant and recent systematic reviews on most questions relating to supportive care. We assessed the certainty in the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, then generated recommendations based on the balance between benefit and harm, resource and cost implications, equity, and feasibility. Recommendations were either strong or weak, or in the form of best practice recommendations.

RESULTS: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign COVID-19 panel issued 54 statements, of which four are best practice statements, nine are strong recommendations, and 35 are weak recommendations. No recommendation was provided for six questions. The topics were: 1) infection control, 2) laboratory diagnosis and specimens, 3) hemodynamic support, 4) ventilatory support, and 5) COVID-19 therapy.

CONCLUSION: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign COVID-19 panel issued several recommendations to help support healthcare workers caring for critically ill ICU patients with COVID-19. When available, we will provide new evidence in further releases of these guidelines.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftCritical Care Medicine
Vol/bind48
Udgave nummer6
Sider (fra-til)e440-e469
ISSN0090-3493
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jun. 2020

ID: 61903573