TY - JOUR
T1 - Survival and Neurological Outcome after Bystander versus Lay Responder Defibrillation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
T2 - A Sub-study of the BOX trial
AU - Sarkisian, Laura
AU - Abdi Isse, Yusuf
AU - Gerke, Oke
AU - Emil Roelsgaard Obling, Laust
AU - Paulin Beske, Ramus
AU - Grand, Johannes
AU - Schmidt, Henrik
AU - Frederiksen Højgaard, Henrik
AU - Abild Stengaard Meyer, Martin
AU - Borregaard, Britt
AU - Hassager, Christian
AU - Kjaergaard, Jesper
AU - Eifer Møller, Jacob
N1 - Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/2
Y1 - 2024/2
N2 - BACKGROUND AND AIM: Bystander defibrillation is associated with increased survival with good neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Dispatch of lay responders could increase defibrillation rates, however, survival with good neurological outcome in these remain unknown. The aim was to compare long-term survival with good neurological outcome in bystander versus lay responder defibrillated OHCAs.METHODS: This is a sub-study of the BOX trial, which included OHCA patients from two Danish tertiary cardiac intensive care units from March 2017 to December 2021. The main outcome was defined as 3-month survival with good neurological performance (Cerebral Performance Category of 1or 2, on a scale from 1 (good cerebral performance) to 5 (death or brain death)). For this study EMS witnessed OHCAs were excluded.RESULTS: Of the 715 patients, a lay responder arrived before EMS in 125 cases (16%). In total, 81 patients were defibrillated by a lay responder (11%), 69 patients by a bystander (10%) and 565 patients by the EMS staff (79%). The 3-month survival with good neurological outcome was 65% and 81% in the lay responder and bystander defibrillated groups, respectively (P = 0.03).CONCLUSION: In patients with OHCA, 3-month survival with good neurological outcome was higher in bystander defibrillated patients compared with lay responder defibrillated patients.
AB - BACKGROUND AND AIM: Bystander defibrillation is associated with increased survival with good neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Dispatch of lay responders could increase defibrillation rates, however, survival with good neurological outcome in these remain unknown. The aim was to compare long-term survival with good neurological outcome in bystander versus lay responder defibrillated OHCAs.METHODS: This is a sub-study of the BOX trial, which included OHCA patients from two Danish tertiary cardiac intensive care units from March 2017 to December 2021. The main outcome was defined as 3-month survival with good neurological performance (Cerebral Performance Category of 1or 2, on a scale from 1 (good cerebral performance) to 5 (death or brain death)). For this study EMS witnessed OHCAs were excluded.RESULTS: Of the 715 patients, a lay responder arrived before EMS in 125 cases (16%). In total, 81 patients were defibrillated by a lay responder (11%), 69 patients by a bystander (10%) and 565 patients by the EMS staff (79%). The 3-month survival with good neurological outcome was 65% and 81% in the lay responder and bystander defibrillated groups, respectively (P = 0.03).CONCLUSION: In patients with OHCA, 3-month survival with good neurological outcome was higher in bystander defibrillated patients compared with lay responder defibrillated patients.
KW - Brain Death
KW - Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
KW - Clinical Trials as Topic
KW - Electric Countershock
KW - Emergency Medical Services
KW - Humans
KW - Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
KW - Registries
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85180601894&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.110059
DO - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.110059
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 38013147
SN - 0300-9572
VL - 195
JO - Resuscitation
JF - Resuscitation
M1 - 110059
ER -