TY - JOUR
T1 - Surveillance after surgery for pancreatic cancer
T2 - a global scoping review of guidelines and a nordic Survey of contemporary practice
AU - Ansari, Daniel
AU - Søreide, Kjetil
AU - Andersson, Bodil
AU - Hansen, Carsten Palnæs
AU - Seppänen, Hanna
AU - Sparrelid, Ernesto
AU - Labori, Knut Jørgen
AU - Kirkegård, Jakob
AU - Kauhanen, Saila
AU - Månsson, Christopher
AU - Nymo, Linn Såve
AU - Nortunen, Minna
AU - Björnsson, Bergthor
AU - Kivivuori, Antti
AU - Tingstedt, Bobby
AU - Bratlie, Svein-Olav
AU - Waardal, Kim
AU - Laukkarinen, Johanna
AU - Halimi, Asif
AU - Lindberg, Hannes
AU - Olin, Håkan
AU - Andersson, Roland
AU - Nordic Pancreatic Cancer Network
PY - 2024/9
Y1 - 2024/9
N2 - OBJECTIVES: Most patients with pancreatic cancer who have undergone surgical resection eventually develop disease recurrence. This study aimed to investigate whether there is evidence to support routine surveillance after pancreatic cancer surgery, with a secondary aim of analyzing the implementation of surveillance strategies in the Nordic countries.MATERIALS AND METHODS: A scoping review was conducted to identify clinical practice guidelines globally and research studies relating to surveillance after pancreatic cancer resection. This was followed by a survey among 20 pancreatic units from four Nordic countries to assess their current practice of follow-up for operated patients.RESULTS: Altogether 16 clinical practice guidelines and 17 research studies were included. The guidelines provided inconsistent recommendations regarding postoperative surveillance of pancreatic cancer. The clinical research data were mainly based on retrospective cohort studies with low level of evidence and lead-time bias was not addressed. Active surveillance was recommended in Sweden and Denmark, but not in Norway beyond the post-operative/adjuvant period. Finland had no national recommendations for surveillance. The Nordic survey revealed a wide variation in reported practice among the different units. About 75% (15 of 20 units) performed routine postoperative surveillance. Routine CA 19-9 testing was used by 80% and routine CT by 67% as part of surveillance. About 73% of centers continued follow-up until 5 years postoperatively.CONCLUSION: Evidence for routine long-term (i.e. 5 years) surveillance after pancreatic cancer surgery remains limited. Most pancreatic units in the Nordic countries conduct regular follow-up, but protocols vary.
AB - OBJECTIVES: Most patients with pancreatic cancer who have undergone surgical resection eventually develop disease recurrence. This study aimed to investigate whether there is evidence to support routine surveillance after pancreatic cancer surgery, with a secondary aim of analyzing the implementation of surveillance strategies in the Nordic countries.MATERIALS AND METHODS: A scoping review was conducted to identify clinical practice guidelines globally and research studies relating to surveillance after pancreatic cancer resection. This was followed by a survey among 20 pancreatic units from four Nordic countries to assess their current practice of follow-up for operated patients.RESULTS: Altogether 16 clinical practice guidelines and 17 research studies were included. The guidelines provided inconsistent recommendations regarding postoperative surveillance of pancreatic cancer. The clinical research data were mainly based on retrospective cohort studies with low level of evidence and lead-time bias was not addressed. Active surveillance was recommended in Sweden and Denmark, but not in Norway beyond the post-operative/adjuvant period. Finland had no national recommendations for surveillance. The Nordic survey revealed a wide variation in reported practice among the different units. About 75% (15 of 20 units) performed routine postoperative surveillance. Routine CA 19-9 testing was used by 80% and routine CT by 67% as part of surveillance. About 73% of centers continued follow-up until 5 years postoperatively.CONCLUSION: Evidence for routine long-term (i.e. 5 years) surveillance after pancreatic cancer surgery remains limited. Most pancreatic units in the Nordic countries conduct regular follow-up, but protocols vary.
KW - Humans
KW - Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
KW - Pancreatectomy
KW - Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery
KW - Population Surveillance
KW - Practice Guidelines as Topic
KW - Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data
KW - Scandinavian and Nordic Countries
KW - Surveys and Questionnaires
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85198340670&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00365521.2024.2378948
DO - 10.1080/00365521.2024.2378948
M3 - Review
C2 - 38994854
SN - 0036-5521
VL - 59
SP - 1097
EP - 1104
JO - Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
JF - Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
IS - 9
ER -