Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Supraglottic airway devices in difficult airway management: a retrospective cohort study of 658,104 general anaesthetics registered in the Danish Anaesthesia Database

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. A difficulty with the DIFFMASK score is the difficult statistics - a reply

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLetterForskningpeer review

  2. Pre-operative methylprednisolone and postoperative delirium after hip fracture surgery - a reply

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLetterForskningpeer review

  3. An international consensus statement on the management of postoperative anaemia after major surgical procedures

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  1. A difficulty with the DIFFMASK score is the difficult statistics - a reply

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLetterForskningpeer review

  2. What Makes for Good Anesthesia Teaching by Faculty in the Operating Room? The Perspective of Anesthesiology Residents

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

Indications for using supraglottic airway devices have widened over time and they now hold a prominent role in guidelines for difficult airway management. We aimed to describe the use of supraglottic airway devices in difficult airway management. We included adult patients undergoing general anaesthesia registered in the Danish Anaesthesia Database from 2008 to 2012 whose airway management had been recorded as difficult, defined as: ≥ 3 tracheal intubation attempts; failed tracheal intubation; or difficult facemask ventilation. In the Danish Anaesthesia Database, a separate difficult airway management module requires the technique used in each successive airway management attempt to be recorded. The primary aim of the study was to describe the use of supraglottic airway devices in cases of difficult airway management. Secondary aims were to examine success rates of supraglottic airway devices in difficult airway management cases, and specifically in the cases of 'cannot intubate, cannot facemask ventilate'. Difficult airway management occurred in 4898 (0.74% (95%CI 0.72-0.76%)) of 658,104 records of general anaesthesia. Supraglottic airway devices were used or use was attempted in 607 cases of difficult airway management (12.4% (95%CI 11.5-13.3%)), and were successful in 395 (65.1% (95%CI 61.2-68.8%)) cases. In 'cannot intubate, cannot facemask ventilate' situations, supraglottic airway devices were used in 86 (18.9% (95%CI 15.6-22.8%)) of 455 records and were successful in 54 (62.8% (95%CI 52.2-72.3%)) cases. We found that supraglottic airway devices are not widely used in the management of the difficult airway despite their prominent role in difficult airway management guidelines.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftAnaesthesia
Vol/bind74
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)151-157
ISSN0003-2409
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2018

ID: 55423532