Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Suicide risk management in research on internet-based interventions for depression: A synthesis of the current state and recommendations for future research

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Hypomania/Mania by DSM-5 definition based on daily smartphone-based patient-reported assessments

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Socio-demographic and clinical risk factors of treatment-resistant depression: A Danish population-based cohort study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Is cesarean section a cause of affective disorders?-A national cohort study using sibling designs

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. The Self-help Online against Suicidal thoughts (SOS) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • Lasse Sander
  • Katharina Gerhardinger
  • Eleanor Bailey
  • Jo Robinson
  • Jiaxi Lin
  • Pim Cuijpers
  • Charlotte Mühlmann
Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: The number of studies examining internet-based interventions (IBIs) for depression is increasing. Although many individuals with depression experience suicidal ideation, there is only insufficient information available on how to manage and support individuals at risk of suicide in IBI trials. Here, we examined the current practice regarding the management of individuals experiencing suicidal thoughts or behaviors in studies of IBIs for depression.

METHODS: Information pertaining to the management of suicidality was extracted from 24 studies. Additionally, researchers in the field completed a questionnaire (n = 13) before being interviewed (n = 11) about their procedures and considerations regarding the management of suicidality.

RESULTS: In most trials (N = 17; 71%), individuals at risk of suicide were excluded based on varying criteria. N = 7 studies used structured interviews and N = 5 studies used single items of self-report questionnaires for assessing suicidality. The nature and degree of support provided to individuals at risk of suicide varied and only one intervention comprised suicide-specific content.

LIMITATIONS: Most experts referred to research on interventions with some level of human support (e.g. written feedback) which might limit the representativeness of the results of the interviews for unguided interventions.

CONCLUSIONS: Suicidality is often treated more as an exclusion criterion rather than a treatable condition in research on IBIs for depression. This paper provides an overview of the current practice and gives recommendations for the design of future trials.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Affective Disorders
Vol/bind263
Sider (fra-til)676-683
Antal sider8
ISSN0165-0327
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 15 feb. 2020

Bibliografisk note

Crown Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

ID: 59375760