Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill children: Protocol for a systematic review

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Anesthesiologists’ airway management expertise: Identifying subjective and objective knowledge gaps

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Characteristics, interventions and longer-term outcomes of COVID-19 ICU patients in Denmark - a nationwide, observational study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Risk factors for long-term cognitive impairment in ICU survivors: A multicenter, prospective cohort study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Characteristics, interventions and longer-term outcomes of COVID-19 ICU patients in Denmark - a nationwide, observational study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Clinical validation of precision medicine protocols: the last mile is the longest

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLederForskningpeer review

  3. Risk factors for long-term cognitive impairment in ICU survivors: A multicenter, prospective cohort study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Stress ulcer prophylaxis is the considered standard of care in many critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Whether there is overall benefit or harm of stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill children is unknown. Accordingly, we aim to assess patient-important benefits and harms of stress ulcer prophylaxis versus placebo or no treatment in critically ill children in the ICU.

METHODS/DESIGN: We will conduct a systematic review of randomized clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis and assess the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or histamine-2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) versus placebo or no prophylaxis. We will systematically search the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, BIOSIS, and Epistemonikos for relevant literature. We will follow the recommendations by the Cochrane Collaboration and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The risk of systematic errors (bias) and random errors will be assessed, and the overall quality of evidence will be evaluated according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

DISCUSSION: There is a need for an updated systematic review to summarize the benefits and harms of stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill children to inform practice and future research.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Vol/bind63
Udgave nummer7
Sider (fra-til)966-972
Antal sider7
ISSN0001-5172
DOI
StatusUdgivet - aug. 2019

Bibliografisk note

© 2019 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

ID: 58599831