TY - JOUR
T1 - Standardised shorter regimens versus individualised longer regimens for rifampin- or multidrug-resistant tuberculosis
AU - Abidi, Syed
AU - Achar, Jay
AU - Assao Neino, Mourtala Mohamed
AU - Bang, Didi
AU - Benedetti, Andrea
AU - Brode, Sarah
AU - Campbell, Jonathon R
AU - Casas, Esther C
AU - Conradie, Francesca
AU - Dravniece, Gunta
AU - du Cros, Philipp
AU - Falzon, Dennis
AU - Jaramillo, Ernesto
AU - Kuaban, Christopher
AU - Lan, Zhiyi
AU - Lange, Christoph
AU - Li, Pei Zhi
AU - Makhmudova, Mavluda
AU - Maug, Aung Kya Jai
AU - Menzies, Dick
AU - Migliori, Giovanni Battista
AU - Miller, Ann
AU - Myrzaliev, Bakyt
AU - Ndjeka, Norbert
AU - Noeske, Jürgen
AU - Parpieva, Nargiza
AU - Piubello, Alberto
AU - Schwoebel, Valérie
AU - Sikhondze, Welile
AU - Singla, Rupak
AU - Souleymane, Mahamadou Bassirou
AU - Trébucq, Arnaud
AU - Van Deun, Armand
AU - Viney, Kerri
AU - Weyer, Karin
AU - Zhang, Betty Jingxuan
AU - Ahmad Khan, Faiz
N1 - The content of this work is copyright of the authors or their employers. Design and branding are copyright ©ERS 2020.
PY - 2020/3
Y1 - 2020/3
N2 - We sought to compare the effectiveness of two World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended regimens for the treatment of rifampin- or multidrug-resistant (RR/MDR) tuberculosis (TB): a standardised regimen of 9-12 months (the "shorter regimen") and individualised regimens of ≥20 months ("longer regimens").We collected individual patient data from observational studies identified through systematic reviews and a public call for data. We included patients meeting WHO eligibility criteria for the shorter regimen: not previously treated with second-line drugs, and with fluoroquinolone- and second-line injectable agent-susceptible RR/MDR-TB. We used propensity score matched, mixed effects meta-regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios and adjusted risk differences (aRDs) for failure or relapse, death within 12 months of treatment initiation and loss to follow-up.We included 2625 out of 3378 (77.7%) individuals from nine studies of shorter regimens and 2717 out of 13 104 (20.7%) individuals from 53 studies of longer regimens. Treatment success was higher with the shorter regimen than with longer regimens (pooled proportions 80.0% versus 75.3%), due to less loss to follow-up with the former (aRD -0.15, 95% CI -0.17- -0.12). The risk difference for failure or relapse was slightly higher with the shorter regimen overall (aRD 0.02, 95% CI 0-0.05) and greater in magnitude with baseline resistance to pyrazinamide (aRD 0.12, 95% CI 0.07-0.16), prothionamide/ethionamide (aRD 0.07, 95% CI -0.01-0.16) or ethambutol (aRD 0.09, 95% CI 0.04-0.13).In patients meeting WHO criteria for its use, the standardised shorter regimen was associated with substantially less loss to follow-up during treatment compared with individualised longer regimens and with more failure or relapse in the presence of resistance to component medications. Our findings support the need to improve access to reliable drug susceptibility testing.
AB - We sought to compare the effectiveness of two World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended regimens for the treatment of rifampin- or multidrug-resistant (RR/MDR) tuberculosis (TB): a standardised regimen of 9-12 months (the "shorter regimen") and individualised regimens of ≥20 months ("longer regimens").We collected individual patient data from observational studies identified through systematic reviews and a public call for data. We included patients meeting WHO eligibility criteria for the shorter regimen: not previously treated with second-line drugs, and with fluoroquinolone- and second-line injectable agent-susceptible RR/MDR-TB. We used propensity score matched, mixed effects meta-regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios and adjusted risk differences (aRDs) for failure or relapse, death within 12 months of treatment initiation and loss to follow-up.We included 2625 out of 3378 (77.7%) individuals from nine studies of shorter regimens and 2717 out of 13 104 (20.7%) individuals from 53 studies of longer regimens. Treatment success was higher with the shorter regimen than with longer regimens (pooled proportions 80.0% versus 75.3%), due to less loss to follow-up with the former (aRD -0.15, 95% CI -0.17- -0.12). The risk difference for failure or relapse was slightly higher with the shorter regimen overall (aRD 0.02, 95% CI 0-0.05) and greater in magnitude with baseline resistance to pyrazinamide (aRD 0.12, 95% CI 0.07-0.16), prothionamide/ethionamide (aRD 0.07, 95% CI -0.01-0.16) or ethambutol (aRD 0.09, 95% CI 0.04-0.13).In patients meeting WHO criteria for its use, the standardised shorter regimen was associated with substantially less loss to follow-up during treatment compared with individualised longer regimens and with more failure or relapse in the presence of resistance to component medications. Our findings support the need to improve access to reliable drug susceptibility testing.
KW - Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use
KW - Humans
KW - Microbial Sensitivity Tests
KW - Mycobacterium tuberculosis
KW - Rifampin
KW - Treatment Outcome
KW - Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/drug therapy
U2 - 10.1183/13993003.01467-2019
DO - 10.1183/13993003.01467-2019
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 31862767
SN - 0904-1850
VL - 55
JO - European Respiratory Journal. Supplement
JF - European Respiratory Journal. Supplement
IS - 3
ER -