TY - JOUR
T1 - Social position and functional somatic disorders
T2 - The DanFunD study
AU - Schovsbo, Signe U
AU - Dantoft, Thomas M
AU - Thuesen, Betina H
AU - Leth-Møller, Katja B
AU - Eplov, Lene F
AU - Petersen, Marie W
AU - Jørgensen, Torben
AU - Osler, Merete
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - BACKGROUND AND AIM: It is generally accepted that functional somatic disorders (FSDs) are a product of biological, psychological, and social factors. Social position might be part of this complex, but the literature on this issue is currently heterogeneous and inconsistent. The aim of the present study was - in a population-based cohort - to test the hypothesis that lower social position would be associated with higher a risk of FSD.METHOD: The association between social position and FSD was examined in a cross-sectional study with various measures of social position (education as measured by vocational training; employment; cohabitation; subjective social status) and delimitations of FSD (irritable bowel syndrome, chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, bodily distress syndrome, and symptom profiles). The associations were analyzed using logistic regressions to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Each social measure was analyzed independently and was adjusted for age and sex.RESULTS: Lower levels of vocational training, being unemployed, and living alone were associated with higher risk of FSD, regardless of the FSD delimitation. There was also a significant negative association between subjective evaluated social status and FSD. The associations remained after multiple adjustments, and seemed to be strongest for the more severe FSD-types.CONCLUSIONS: Lower social position is associated with higher risk of FSD, especially the more severe FSD delimitations, which might constitute an especially vulnerable group. However, the mechanisms behind the relations remain unknown.
AB - BACKGROUND AND AIM: It is generally accepted that functional somatic disorders (FSDs) are a product of biological, psychological, and social factors. Social position might be part of this complex, but the literature on this issue is currently heterogeneous and inconsistent. The aim of the present study was - in a population-based cohort - to test the hypothesis that lower social position would be associated with higher a risk of FSD.METHOD: The association between social position and FSD was examined in a cross-sectional study with various measures of social position (education as measured by vocational training; employment; cohabitation; subjective social status) and delimitations of FSD (irritable bowel syndrome, chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, bodily distress syndrome, and symptom profiles). The associations were analyzed using logistic regressions to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Each social measure was analyzed independently and was adjusted for age and sex.RESULTS: Lower levels of vocational training, being unemployed, and living alone were associated with higher risk of FSD, regardless of the FSD delimitation. There was also a significant negative association between subjective evaluated social status and FSD. The associations remained after multiple adjustments, and seemed to be strongest for the more severe FSD-types.CONCLUSIONS: Lower social position is associated with higher risk of FSD, especially the more severe FSD delimitations, which might constitute an especially vulnerable group. However, the mechanisms behind the relations remain unknown.
KW - Cross-Sectional Studies
KW - Data Collection
KW - Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic/diagnosis
KW - Fibromyalgia/diagnosis
KW - Humans
KW - Irritable Bowel Syndrome
KW - education
KW - Social position
KW - DanFunD
KW - employment
KW - cohabitation
KW - functional somatic disorders
KW - functional somatic syndromes
KW - bodily distress syndrome
KW - epidemiology
KW - subjective social status
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85112029454&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/14034948211056752
DO - 10.1177/14034948211056752
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 34796745
VL - 51
SP - 225
EP - 232
JO - Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. Supplement
JF - Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. Supplement
SN - 1403-4956
IS - 2
ER -