Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Short-term outcomes after complete mesocolic excision compared with 'conventional' colonic cancer surgery

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination modelling for safe surgery to save lives: data from an international prospective cohort study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Delaying surgery for patients with a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLetterForskningpeer review

  3. Perioperative care guidelines: conflicts and controversies

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLederForskningpeer review

  4. Differential recurrence after laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: importance of a nationwide registry-based mesh surveillance

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Impact of a Parastomal Bulge on Quality of Life - A Cross-sectional Study of Patients From the Danish Stoma Database

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Short-term outcomes after transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in Denmark - a prospective multicentre study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Safety of early ileostomy closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  4. Accuracy of preoperative staging with multidetector computed tomography in colon cancer

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Complete mesocolic excision (CME) seems to be associated with improved oncological outcomes compared with 'conventional' surgery, but there is a potential for higher morbidity.

METHODS: Data for patients after elective resection at the four centres in the Capital Region of Denmark (June 2008 to December 2013) were retrieved from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group database and medical charts. Approval from a Danish ethics committee was not required (retrospective study).

RESULTS: Some 529 patients who underwent CME surgery at one centre were compared with 1701 patients undergoing 'conventional' resection at the other three hospitals. Laparoscopic CME was performed in 258 (48·8 per cent) and laparoscopic 'conventional' resection in 1172 (68·9 per cent). More extended right colectomy procedures were done in the CME group (17·4 versus 3·6 per cent). The 90-day mortality rate in the CME group was 6·2 per cent versus 4·9 per cent in the 'conventional' group (P = 0·219), with a propensity score-adjusted logistic regression odds ratio (OR) of 1·22 (95 per cent c.i. 0·79 to 1·87). Laparoscopic surgery was associated with a lower risk of mortality at 90 days (OR 0·63, 0·42 to 0·95). Intraoperative injury to other organs was more common in CME operations (9·1 per cent versus 3·6 per cent for 'conventional' resection; P < 0·001), including more splenic (3·2 versus 1·2 per cent; P = 0·004) and superior mesenteric vein (1·7 versus 0·2 per cent; P < 0·001) injuries. Rates of sepsis with vasopressor requirement (6·6 versus 3·2 per cent; P = 0·001) and postoperative respiratory failure (8·1 versus 3·4 per cent; P < 0·001) were higher in the CME group.

CONCLUSION: CME is associated with more intraoperative organ injuries and severe non-surgical complications than 'conventional' resection for colonic cancer.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftThe British journal of surgery
Vol/bind103
Udgave nummer5
Sider (fra-til)581-589
ISSN0007-1323
DOI
StatusUdgivet - apr. 2016

ID: 46016582