Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Shared decision-making in dialysis choice has potential to improve self-management in people with kidney disease: A qualitative follow-up study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. We are not heroes—The flipside of the hero narrative amidst the COVID19‐pandemic: A Danish hospital ethnography

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. A qualitative study of adolescent cancer survivors perspectives on social support from healthy peers - A RESPECT study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. 了解医院外心脏骤停后日常生活中短期和长期后果的生活经验。焦点小组研究

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Involvement of patients with chronic kidney disease in research: A case study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Patient ambassador support in newly diagnosed patients with acute leukemia during treatment: a feasibility study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Patient use of a self-monitoring app during eating disorder treatment: Naturalistic longitudinal cohort study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Choice of dialysis modality: patients' experiences and quality of decision after shared decision-making

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

AIMS: To explore how patients remained involved in their treatment and care of their own health following a shared decision-making intervention for dialysis choice.

DESIGN: A follow-up study using semi-structured interviews.

METHODS: Individual interviews with 13 patients were conducted immediately following their participation in a shared decision-making intervention for dialysis choice and again 3 months after initiating dialysis. This study reports findings from the follow-up interviews 3 month after dialysis initiation. Data were collected from August 2017-February 2019 and analysed using systematic text condensation.

RESULTS: The analysis revealed five main findings, which indicated differing levels of: (a) involvement in the decision-making process; (b) involvement in treatment; (c) involvement in care of own health; (d) involvement of a relative; and (e) support from healthcare professionals.

CONCLUSIONS: Following the shared decision-making intervention, patients who chose home-based treatment had become more involved in their treatment and care of their own health. The involvement of relatives and support from healthcare professionals contributed positively to this. In contrast, patients who had chosen hospital-based treatment were less involved in their treatment.

IMPACT: Shared decision-making in dialysis choice has potential to improve self-management in people with kidney disease. However, support from healthcare professionals for patients and their relatives should be prioritized in an effort to increase all patients' involvement in their treatment and care of their own health.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Advanced Nursing
Vol/bind77
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)1878-1887
Antal sider10
ISSN0309-2402
DOI
StatusUdgivet - apr. 2021

Bibliografisk note

© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

ID: 61568718