Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Self-Collected versus Healthcare Worker-Collected Swabs in the Diagnosis of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Multicentric Atrial Strain COmparison between Two Different Modalities: MASCOT HIT Study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Limited diagnostic utility of Chromogranin A measurements in workup of neuroendocrine tumors

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Atherosclerosis Imaging with 18F-Sodium Fluoride PET

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  4. Gastrointestinal Applications of Iodine Quantification Using Dual-Energy CT: A Systematic Review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  1. Pulmonary Arterial Enlargement in Well-Treated Persons With Human Immunodeficiency Virus

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. TORS Base-of-Tongue Mucosectomy in Human Papilloma Virus-Negative Carcinoma of Unknown Primary

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Penetrating Orbital Sphenoid Sinus Trauma with a Wooden Stick: A Challenging Case Report

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

The aim of this study was to compare the sensitivity of self-collected versus healthcare worker (HCW)-collected swabs for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing. Symptomatic individuals referred for SARS-CoV-2 testing were invited to provide mobile-phone video-instructed self-collected oropharyngeal and nasal samples followed by a HCW-collected oropharyngeal sample. All samples were sent for analysis to the same microbiology laboratory, and the number of SARS-CoV-2-positive participants in the two tests was compared. A total of 109 participants were included, and 19 participants had SARS-CoV-2-positive results. The diagnostic sensitivity of the self-collected and HCW-collected swabs was 84.2% and 89.5%, respectively, with an acceptable agreement, Cohens kappa 0.82, p < 0.001. Further, results from a questionnaire answered by the participants found that loss of smell as a self-reported symptom was a strong predictor for a SARS-CoV-2-positive test. In conclusion, we found that self-collected oropharyngeal and nasal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 testing can be reliable compared to HCW-collected oropharyngeal samples.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftDiagnostics
Vol/bind10
Udgave nummer9
ISSN2075-4418
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 9 sep. 2020

ID: 61231121