Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
E-pub ahead of print

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are still harmful and ineffective. Responses to the comments by Hieronymus et al

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Differential plastic changes in synthesis and binding in the mouse somatostatin system after electroconvulsive stimulation

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Effects of erythropoietin on body composition and fat-glucose metabolism in patients with affective disorders

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. The Psychotic Depression Assessment Scale (PDAS) in measurement-based care of patients with psychotic depression

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Anaesthesia for electroconvulsive therapy - new tricks for old drugs: a systematic review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  1. Acupuncture for chronic hepatitis B

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Exercise-Based Rehabilitation for Heart Failure: Cochrane Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Plasma expanders for people with cirrhosis and large ascites treated with abdominal paracentesis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  4. Radix Sophorae flavescentis versus other drugs or herbs for chronic hepatitis B

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

In this response, we address point by point the additional issues raised by Hieronymus et al. in their second round of critique of our systematic review on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for major depression. We repulse that we are biased or mistaken in any major ways. We acknowledge that we missed a few small, mostly unpublished trials, and we made a few minor errors in our systematic review. However, these omissions and errors neither have any impact on our overall results nor on our conclusions. The critique by Hieronymus et al.seem to raise questions about their understanding of the systematic review process and, on several occasions, they wrongly claimed that we made errors. Our analyses should be impartial and free from any biases or prejudices as we do not have any obligation to support the interests of sponsors or other groups.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftActa Neuropsychiatrica
Sider (fra-til)1-28
Antal sider28
ISSN1601-5215
DOI
StatusE-pub ahead of print - 24 jun. 2019

ID: 57627000