Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Selective attrition does not affect cross-sectional estimates of associations with emotional and behavioral problems in a longitudinal study with onset in adolescence

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Sex differences in trauma exposure and symptomatology in trauma-affected refugees

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. PTSD with secondary psychotic features among trauma-affected refugees: The role of torture and depression

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. A systematic review of blood-based serotonergic biomarker in Bulimia Nervosa

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Predictors and outcomes of self-reported dysregulation profiles in youth from age 11 to 21 years

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. ADHD management during the COVID-19 pandemic: guidance from the European ADHD Guidelines Group

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Prevalence of seasonal depression in a prospective cohort study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

The present examination raises the question whether attrition in a longitudinal study leads to biased findings. The Zurich Adolescent Psychology and Psychopathology Study (ZAPPS) originated in 1994 by following a sample of 1239 adolescents with follow-ups after three, six, and 22 years. The study collected data on life-events, self-esteem, and coping behavior as independent and mental problems as dependent variables. The baseline sample was partitioned according to follow-up status for the three subsequent waves of assessment. Baseline measures of associations between independent and dependent variables were compared for those retained in the study (group A) and those lost to follow-up (group B) at each phase of cross-sectional data collection by use of multiple linear regression analyses. There were significant differences for some baseline independent variables between the two groups with small effect sizes. Males and migrants dropped out more frequently. The main findings indicated that the strength of the associations between independent and dependent variables at baseline in the total sample and in each of the two groups as defined by sample sizes at the three follow-ups was close to equal. Thus, one may conclude from the current study that attrition in longitudinal studies rarely affects cross-sectional estimates of associations.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer112685
TidsskriftPsychiatry Research
Vol/bind284
ISSN0165-1781
DOI
StatusUdgivet - feb. 2020

Bibliografisk note

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

ID: 59340996