TY - JOUR
T1 - School performance in Danish children exposed to maternal type 1 diabetes in utero
T2 - A nationwide retrospective cohort study
AU - Spangmose, Anne Lærke
AU - Skipper, Niels
AU - Knorr, Sine
AU - Wullum Gundersen, Tina
AU - Beck Jensen, Rikke
AU - Damm, Peter
AU - Lykke Mortensen, Erik
AU - Pinborg, Anja
AU - Svensson, Jannet
AU - Clausen, Tine
PY - 2022/4
Y1 - 2022/4
N2 - BACKGROUND: Conflicting results have been reported concerning possible adverse effects on the cognitive function of offspring of mothers with type 1 diabetes (O-mT1D). Previous studies have included offspring of parents from the background population (O-BP), but not offspring of fathers with type 1 diabetes (O-fT1D) as the unexposed reference group.METHODS AND FINDINGS: This is a population-based retrospective cohort study from 2010 to 2016. Nationally standardized school test scores (range, 1 to 100) were obtained for public school grades 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 in O-mT1D and compared with those in O-fT1D and O-BP. Of the 622,073 included children, 2,144 were O-mT1D, and 3,474 were O-fT1D. Multiple linear regression models were used to compare outcomes, including the covariates offspring with type 1 diabetes, parity, number of siblings, offspring sex, smoking during pregnancy, parental age, and socioeconomic factors. Mean test scores were 54.2 (standard deviation, SD 24.8) in O-mT1D, 54.4 (SD 24.8) in O-fT1D, and 56.4 (SD 24.7) in O-BP. In adjusted analyses, the mean differences in test scores were -1.59 (95% CI -2.48 to -0.71, p < 0.001) between O-mT1D and O-BP and -0.78 (95% CI -1.48 to -0.08, p = 0.03) between O-fT1D and O-BP. No significant difference in the adjusted mean test scores was found between O-mT1D and O-fT1D (p = 0.16). The study's limitation was no access to measures of glycemic control during pregnancy.CONCLUSIONS: O-mT1D achieved lower test scores than O-BP but similar test scores compared with O-fT1D. Glycemic control during pregnancy is essential to prevent various adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with type 1 diabetes. However, the present study reduces previous concerns regarding adverse effects of in utero hyperglycemia on offspring cognitive function.
AB - BACKGROUND: Conflicting results have been reported concerning possible adverse effects on the cognitive function of offspring of mothers with type 1 diabetes (O-mT1D). Previous studies have included offspring of parents from the background population (O-BP), but not offspring of fathers with type 1 diabetes (O-fT1D) as the unexposed reference group.METHODS AND FINDINGS: This is a population-based retrospective cohort study from 2010 to 2016. Nationally standardized school test scores (range, 1 to 100) were obtained for public school grades 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 in O-mT1D and compared with those in O-fT1D and O-BP. Of the 622,073 included children, 2,144 were O-mT1D, and 3,474 were O-fT1D. Multiple linear regression models were used to compare outcomes, including the covariates offspring with type 1 diabetes, parity, number of siblings, offspring sex, smoking during pregnancy, parental age, and socioeconomic factors. Mean test scores were 54.2 (standard deviation, SD 24.8) in O-mT1D, 54.4 (SD 24.8) in O-fT1D, and 56.4 (SD 24.7) in O-BP. In adjusted analyses, the mean differences in test scores were -1.59 (95% CI -2.48 to -0.71, p < 0.001) between O-mT1D and O-BP and -0.78 (95% CI -1.48 to -0.08, p = 0.03) between O-fT1D and O-BP. No significant difference in the adjusted mean test scores was found between O-mT1D and O-fT1D (p = 0.16). The study's limitation was no access to measures of glycemic control during pregnancy.CONCLUSIONS: O-mT1D achieved lower test scores than O-BP but similar test scores compared with O-fT1D. Glycemic control during pregnancy is essential to prevent various adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with type 1 diabetes. However, the present study reduces previous concerns regarding adverse effects of in utero hyperglycemia on offspring cognitive function.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85128923342&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003977
DO - 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003977
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 35472047
VL - 19
SP - e1003977
JO - PLOS Medicine
JF - PLOS Medicine
SN - 1549-1277
IS - 4
M1 - e1003977
ER -