Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Scandinavian SSAI clinical practice guideline on choice of first-line vasopressor for patients with acute circulatory failure

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Hypothermic to ischemic ratio and mortality in post-cardiac arrest patients

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Response letter to comments made by J. G. Förster, M. Pitkänen

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLetterForskningpeer review

  3. APACHE II score validation in emergency abdominal surgery. A post hoc analysis of the InCare trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. APACHE II score validation in emergency abdominal surgery. A post hoc analysis of the InCare trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Effects of magnesium, phosphate and zinc supplementation in ICU patients-Protocol for a systematic review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  3. Long-term patient-important outcomes after septic shock: a protocol for 1-year follow-up of the CLASSIC-trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Adult critically ill patients often suffer from acute circulatory failure, necessitating use of vasopressor therapy. The aim of the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (SSAI) task force for Acute Circulatory Failure was to present clinically relevant, evidence-based treatment recommendations on this topic.

METHODS: This guideline was developed according to standards for trustworthy guidelines, including a systematic review of the literature and use of the GRADE methodology for assessment of the quality of evidence and for moving from evidence to recommendations. We assessed the following subpopulations of patients with acute circulatory failure: 1) shock in general, 2) septic shock, 3) cardiogenic shock, 4) hypovolemic shock and 5) other types of shock, including vasodilatory shock. We assessed patient-important outcome measures, including mortality, serious adverse reactions and quality-of-life.

RESULTS: For patients with shock in general and those with septic shock, we recommend using norepinephrine rather than dopamine, and we suggest using norepinephrine rather than epinephrine, vasopressin analogues, and phenylephrine. For patients with cardiogenic shock and those with hypovolemic shock, we suggest using norepinephrine rather than dopamine, and we provide no recommendations/suggestions of norepinephrine vs. epinephrine, vasopressin analogues, and phenylephrine. For patients with other types of shock, including vasodilatory shock, we suggest using norepinephrine rather than dopamine, epinephrine, vasopressin analogues, and phenylephrine.

CONCLUSIONS: We recommend using norepinephrine rather than other vasopressors as first-line treatment for the majority of adult critically ill patients with acute circulatory failure.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Vol/bind60
Udgave nummer10
Sider (fra-til)1347-1366
Antal sider20
ISSN0001-5172
DOI
StatusUdgivet - nov. 2016

ID: 49576863