Same review quality in open versus blinded peer review in "Ugeskrift for Læger"

20 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

Research into the peer review process has previously been conducted in English-language journals. This study deals with a Danish general medical journal with a relatively small pool of both reviewers and readers. The aim of the study was to compare the quality of reviews produced by identifiable and anonymous reviewers, and further to characterize authors' and reviewers' attitudes towards different peer review systems.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftDanish Medical Journal
Vol/bind59
Udgave nummer8
Sider (fra-til)A4479
StatusUdgivet - 2012

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Same review quality in open versus blinded peer review in "Ugeskrift for Læger"'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater