Safety of pulmonary function testing: data from 20 years

Cara Roberts, Simon Ward, Emil Walsted, James H Hull

11 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary function testing (PFT) is a key investigation in the evaluation of individuals with respiratory symptoms; however, the safety of routine and specialised PFT testing has not been reported in a large data set. Using patient safety incident (PSI) records, we aimed to assess risk of PFT and to characterise these events and any associated risk factors.

METHODS: In this single-centre audit, demographics and PSI data were collected and categorised for PFT performed between 1996 and 2016 and subdivided into cardiopulmonary or non-cardiopulmonary events. The severity of each PSI was rated using the NHS National Patient Safety Agency and any hospital admission reported.

RESULTS: There were 119 PSIs reported from 186 000 PFT; that is, 0.6 PSIs per 1000 tests. Cardiopulmonary PSIs were 3.3 times more likely to occur than non-cardiopulmonary (95% CI 2.17 to 5.12). Syncope was the most frequently occurring cardiopulmonary PSI. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing was associated with 2 PSIs per 1000 tests. PSIs necessitating hospital admission and/or emergency department attendance occurred approximately once every 10 000 tests and there was no PFT-associated mortality.

CONCLUSION: Routine and specialised PFT is safe for patients, in the context of established screening preparticipation guidelines. In the event of a PSI, these are likely to be low risk of harm. Our findings highlight the most common PSIs encountered during PFT to facilitate risk reduction.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftThorax
Vol/bind73
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)385-387
ISSN0040-6376
DOI
StatusUdgivet - apr. 2018

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Safety of pulmonary function testing: data from 20 years'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater