Safety of early ileostomy closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Frederik Bjerg Clausen, Niclas Dohrn, Emma Rosenkrantz Hölmich, Mads Klein, Ismail Gögenur

10 Citationer (Scopus)


PURPOSE: Patients with a defunctioning ileostomy after rectal resection experience substantial ileostomy-related morbidity and decreased quality of life. Early reversal of the defunctioning ileostomy has been proposed as a method of mitigating these problems. We aimed to evaluate the safety of early ileostomy closure within 6 weeks.

METHOD: Randomized controlled trials investigating the safety of early ileostomy closure were identified through a systematic search and review of the current literature. Meta-analysis of the extracted outcome data was performed, and the methodological quality of the individual studies was assessed.

RESULTS: The search identified six eligible studies yielding a total of 528 patients, with 269 in the early closure (EC) group and 259 in the standard closure (SC) group. Major complications in the EC group was 5.2% compared with 3.6% in the SC group (RR = 1.12, 95% CI 0.33-3.79). Anastomotic leakage in the EC group was 3.3% compared with 3.5% in the SC group (RR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.29-2.75). The meta-analysis resulted in no statistically significant differences between the groups in any of the primary or secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSION: This review was not able to discern a statistically significant difference in postoperative complications when comparing early and standard ileostomy closure. The current literature indicates that early ileostomy closure is not associated with higher complication rates in patients with an uncomplicated postoperative course and radiologically verified intact distal anastomosis after index surgery.

TidsskriftInternational Journal of Colorectal Disease
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)203-212
Antal sider10
StatusUdgivet - feb. 2021


Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Safety of early ileostomy closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.