Harvard
Ottesen, NM, Meluken, I, Frikke-Schmidt, R, Plomgaard, P, Scheike, T
, Kessing, LV, Miskowiak, K & Vinberg, M 2020, '
S100B and brain derived neurotrophic factor in monozygotic twins with, at risk of and without affective disorders'
Journal of Affective Disorders, bind 274, s. 726-732.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.015
APA
Ottesen, N. M., Meluken, I., Frikke-Schmidt, R., Plomgaard, P., Scheike, T.
, Kessing, L. V., ... Vinberg, M. (2020).
S100B and brain derived neurotrophic factor in monozygotic twins with, at risk of and without affective disorders.
Journal of Affective Disorders,
274, 726-732.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.015
CBE
MLA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
@article{843fc706c34a4d47b44e7ea06f6e6c47,
title = "S100B and brain derived neurotrophic factor in monozygotic twins with, at risk of and without affective disorders",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The calcium binding protein S100B and brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) are both biomarkers implicated in neuronal processes in the central nervous system and seem to be associated with affective disorders. Here we investigated both markers in a sample of monozygotic (MZ) twins with, at risk of and without affective disorders, aiming to evaluate whether these markers have a role as causal factors- or trait markers for affective disorders.METHOD: We measured serum S100B and plasma BDNF levels in 204 monozygotic twins (MZ) with unipolar or bipolar disorder in remission or partial remission (affected), their unaffected co-twins (high-risk) and twins with no personal or family history of affective disorder (low-risk).RESULTS: No significant group differences in S100B and BDNF levels were found between the three groups. Exploratory analysis revealed that higher S100B levels were correlated with lower cognitive performance.LIMITATIONS: The cross-sectional design cannot elucidate the two neuronal biomarkers role as causal factors. We would have preferred a higher sample size in the high- and low-risk groups.CONCLUSION: The present result did not support a role for S100B and BDNF as neither causal factors nor trait markers for affective disorders. Elevated S100B levels may associate with impaired cognition, but further studies are warranted.",
author = "Ottesen, {Ninja Meinhard} and Iselin Meluken and Ruth Frikke-Schmidt and Peter Plomgaard and Thomas Scheike and Kessing, {Lars Vedel} and Kamilla Miskowiak and Maj Vinberg",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.",
year = "2020",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.015",
language = "English",
volume = "274",
pages = "726--732",
journal = "Journal of Affective Disorders",
issn = "0165-0327",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - S100B and brain derived neurotrophic factor in monozygotic twins with, at risk of and without affective disorders
AU - Ottesen, Ninja Meinhard
AU - Meluken, Iselin
AU - Frikke-Schmidt, Ruth
AU - Plomgaard, Peter
AU - Scheike, Thomas
AU - Kessing, Lars Vedel
AU - Miskowiak, Kamilla
AU - Vinberg, Maj
N1 - Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2020/9/1
Y1 - 2020/9/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: The calcium binding protein S100B and brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) are both biomarkers implicated in neuronal processes in the central nervous system and seem to be associated with affective disorders. Here we investigated both markers in a sample of monozygotic (MZ) twins with, at risk of and without affective disorders, aiming to evaluate whether these markers have a role as causal factors- or trait markers for affective disorders.METHOD: We measured serum S100B and plasma BDNF levels in 204 monozygotic twins (MZ) with unipolar or bipolar disorder in remission or partial remission (affected), their unaffected co-twins (high-risk) and twins with no personal or family history of affective disorder (low-risk).RESULTS: No significant group differences in S100B and BDNF levels were found between the three groups. Exploratory analysis revealed that higher S100B levels were correlated with lower cognitive performance.LIMITATIONS: The cross-sectional design cannot elucidate the two neuronal biomarkers role as causal factors. We would have preferred a higher sample size in the high- and low-risk groups.CONCLUSION: The present result did not support a role for S100B and BDNF as neither causal factors nor trait markers for affective disorders. Elevated S100B levels may associate with impaired cognition, but further studies are warranted.
AB - BACKGROUND: The calcium binding protein S100B and brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) are both biomarkers implicated in neuronal processes in the central nervous system and seem to be associated with affective disorders. Here we investigated both markers in a sample of monozygotic (MZ) twins with, at risk of and without affective disorders, aiming to evaluate whether these markers have a role as causal factors- or trait markers for affective disorders.METHOD: We measured serum S100B and plasma BDNF levels in 204 monozygotic twins (MZ) with unipolar or bipolar disorder in remission or partial remission (affected), their unaffected co-twins (high-risk) and twins with no personal or family history of affective disorder (low-risk).RESULTS: No significant group differences in S100B and BDNF levels were found between the three groups. Exploratory analysis revealed that higher S100B levels were correlated with lower cognitive performance.LIMITATIONS: The cross-sectional design cannot elucidate the two neuronal biomarkers role as causal factors. We would have preferred a higher sample size in the high- and low-risk groups.CONCLUSION: The present result did not support a role for S100B and BDNF as neither causal factors nor trait markers for affective disorders. Elevated S100B levels may associate with impaired cognition, but further studies are warranted.
U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.015
DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.015
M3 - Journal article
VL - 274
SP - 726
EP - 732
JO - Journal of Affective Disorders
JF - Journal of Affective Disorders
SN - 0165-0327
ER -